What is the purpose of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c)?
Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) is designed to disqualify certain prior art for obviousness considerations under specific conditions. As stated in the MPEP, It is important to recognize that pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) applies only to consideration of prior art for purposes of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103. It does not apply to or affect subject…
Read MoreWhat is the significance of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) in patent examination?
Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) is significant in patent examination as it provides a way to disqualify certain prior art references in obviousness rejections. The MPEP states: “Examiners are reminded that a reference used in an anticipatory rejection under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e), (f), or (g) is not disqualified as prior art if the reference is…
Read MoreHow does Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) affect joint research agreements?
How does Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) affect joint research agreements? Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) has significant implications for joint research agreements. The MPEP 2146 provides guidance on this matter: “Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) applies to subject matter developed by another person which qualifies as prior art only under one or more of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C.…
Read MoreHow does pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) affect double patenting rejections?
Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) does not affect double patenting rejections. The MPEP clearly states: “In addition, double patenting rejections, based on subject matter now disqualified as prior art in amended pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c), should still be made as appropriate. See 37 CFR 1.78(c) and MPEP § 804.” This means that even if certain subject…
Read MoreHow has pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) changed over time?
Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) has undergone several changes: Prior to November 29, 1999: It disqualified prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(f) or (g) for obviousness determinations if commonly owned. November 29, 1999: Expanded to include prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(e). December 10, 2004: The CREATE Act further amended it to include subject matter developed…
Read MoreHow does pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) affect anticipation rejections?
Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) specifically applies to obviousness rejections and does not affect anticipation rejections. The MPEP clearly states: “Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) applies only to prior art usable in an obviousness rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103. Subject matter that qualifies as anticipatory prior art under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 is not affected, and may…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for applying pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(b)?
There are several key requirements for applying pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(b): The biotechnological process and composition of matter must be in the same application or separate applications with the same effective filing date. Both must be owned or assigned to the same person when the process was invented. The patent issued on the process must…
Read MoreWhat is pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(b) and when does it apply?
Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(b) is a provision applicable to biotechnological processes. It precludes a rejection of process claims which involve the use or making of certain nonobvious biotechnological compositions of matter under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a). This provision is only applicable to applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102. As stated in the MPEP: Only…
Read MoreWhat is the relevance of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(g) in patent law?
Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(g) is a provision in U.S. patent law that was relevant before the America Invents Act (AIA) came into effect. According to MPEP 2138.02: “Prior art under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(g) is limited to an invention that is made.” This section of the law was significant because it: Defined what could be…
Read MoreWhat is pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(g) and how does it affect patent applications?
Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(g) is a provision in patent law that bars the issuance of a patent when another inventor made the same invention in the United States before the applicant and had not abandoned, suppressed, or concealed it. This section primarily applies to patent applications filed before March 16, 2013, which are not subject…
Read More