How does the oath or declaration requirement differ for divisional applications?

How does the oath or declaration requirement differ for divisional applications? For divisional applications, the oath or declaration requirement can be simplified under certain conditions. According to MPEP 201.06(c): “The divisional application may be filed under 37 CFR 1.53(b) using all or part of a copy of the oath or declaration filed in the prior…

Read More

What is a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) and when can it be filed?

A Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) is a type of continuation or divisional application that can be filed for design patent applications under 37 CFR 1.53(d). It allows an applicant to continue prosecution of a prior design application. As stated in the MPEP: A continuation or divisional application (but not a continuation-in-part) of a prior nonprovisional…

Read More

How does a CPA affect the examination process and priority?

Filing a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) can impact the examination process and priority. Key points include: CPAs are generally treated as “amended” applications for examination priority purposes This may result in faster first Office actions compared to new applications Preliminary amendments should be filed with the CPA to avoid potential denial of entry Information Disclosure…

Read More

How does a CPA affect benefit claims and references to prior applications?

A Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) has specific effects on benefit claims and references to prior applications: The CPA request itself serves as the specific reference required by 35 U.S.C. 120 No amendment to the specification or application data sheet is required or permitted to reference the prior application A CPA automatically includes a benefit claim…

Read More

What are the filing requirements for a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) under 37 CFR 1.53(d)?

The filing requirements for a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) under 37 CFR 1.53(d) are as follows: The CPA must be filed before the earliest of: Payment of the issue fee on the prior application, unless a petition under 37 CFR 1.313(c) is granted; Abandonment of the prior application; or Termination of proceedings on the prior…

Read More

When is a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) acceptable?

A Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) is acceptable when it meets the requirements set forth in 37 CFR 1.53(d). According to MPEP § 201, the examiner will use specific language to indicate acceptance: The request filed on [date] for a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) under 37 CFR 1.53(d) based on parent Application No. [number] is acceptable…

Read More

How does the USPTO handle ‘conditional’ requests for CPAs?

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) treats all ‘conditional’ requests for Continued Prosecution Applications (CPAs) as unconditional requests. This is clearly stated in MPEP ¶ 2.35: “Any ‘conditional’ request for a CPA submitted as a separate paper is treated as an unconditional request for a CPA.” This means that once a CPA request…

Read More