How does the oath or declaration requirement differ for continuation applications filed before and after September 16, 2012?

The oath or declaration requirements for continuation applications differ significantly depending on whether they were filed before or after September 16, 2012: For applications filed on or after September 16, 2012: The inventor’s oath or declaration must comply with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 115 as revised effective September 16, 2012. It must state that…

Read More

How does the inventorship requirement differ for continuation applications filed before and after September 16, 2012?

The inventorship requirements for continuation applications differ based on whether they were filed before or after September 16, 2012: For applications filed on or after September 16, 2012: The inventorship is determined by the information provided in the application data sheet (ADS) filed before or concurrently with the copy of the inventor’s oath or declaration…

Read More

How does the USPTO handle preliminary amendments in continuation applications?

The USPTO’s handling of preliminary amendments in continuation applications depends on when the application was filed and the nature of the amendment: For applications filed on or after September 21, 2004: A preliminary amendment that is present on the filing date of the application is considered part of the original disclosure. All preliminary amendments: Must…

Read More

What is a ‘bypass’ continuation application?

A ‘bypass’ continuation application is a specific type of continuation application that is filed under 37 CFR 1.53(b) to ‘bypass’ the national stage of an international application. As explained in MPEP 201.06(c): “A continuation application filed under 37 CFR 1.53(b) may be filed as a continuation of an international application designating the United States without…

Read More

Can a divisional application claim benefit to a parent application’s filing date?

Yes, a divisional application can claim the benefit of its parent application’s filing date. According to MPEP 201.06(c): “A divisional application is entitled to the benefit of the filing date of the prior-filed application if the prior-filed application discloses the invention claimed in the divisional application in the manner provided by the first paragraph of…

Read More

What is the difference between a divisional and a continuation application?

What is the difference between a divisional and a continuation application? While both divisional and continuation applications are types of continuing applications, they serve different purposes: Divisional Application: Filed to pursue claims to an invention that was not elected in a previous application due to a restriction requirement. Continuation Application: Filed to pursue additional claims…

Read More

What is the difference between applications filed under 37 CFR 1.53(b) and 37 CFR 1.53(d) regarding affidavits?

The treatment of affidavits and declarations differs between applications filed under 37 CFR 1.53(b) and those filed under 37 CFR 1.53(d). According to MPEP ¶ 2.03: “Do not use this form paragraph in applications filed under 37 CFR 1.53(d) since affidavits and/or declarations, such as those submitted under 37 CFR 1.130, 1.131 and 1.132 filed…

Read More