How is an applicant notified that a CPA has been established?

Unlike regular patent applications, applicants are not typically notified when a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) has been established. The MPEP ¶ 2.30 states: “This notice should be given, since applicant is not notified of the abandonment of the parent nor is a filing receipt normally sent for a CPA.” Instead, the first notification an applicant…

Read More

What information should be included in a CPA request?

When filing a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) request, certain key information must be included. Based on MPEP ¶ 2.35, the following details are essential: The filing date of the CPA request The application number of the prior application The MPEP states: “Receipt is acknowledged of the ‘conditional’ request for a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) filed…

Read More

How does the USPTO notify applicants about an unacceptable CPA request?

When the USPTO receives an unacceptable Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) request for a design patent application, they notify the applicant using a standardized form paragraph. According to MPEP ¶ 2.31, the examiner will use the following language: Receipt is acknowledged of the request for a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) filed on [1] under 37 CFR…

Read More

How does a CPA differ from other types of continuing applications?

A Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) differs from other types of continuing applications in several ways: CPAs are only available for design applications, not utility applications. Filing a CPA automatically establishes the necessary reference to the prior application under 35 U.S.C. 120, without needing to amend the specification. CPAs are processed differently from other continuing applications,…

Read More