How does the patent examination process work?
The patent examination process involves a back-and-forth between the examiner and the applicant. MPEP 203.03 describes a key part of this process: An ‘amended’ nonprovisional application is one that having been acted on by the examiner, has in turn been acted on by the applicant in reply to the examiner’s action. The general steps in…
Read MoreWhat is the difference between an unintentional delay and an intentional delay in filing a benefit claim?
The distinction between unintentional and intentional delay is crucial when filing a delayed benefit claim. The MPEP 211.04 addresses this: ‘A petition to accept an unintentionally delayed claim under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) for the benefit of a prior-filed application must be accompanied by: … (3) A statement that the entire delay…
Read MoreCan a petition for an unintentionally delayed priority claim be filed after the patent issues?
Yes, a petition for an unintentionally delayed priority claim can be filed after a patent issues, but it requires a different procedure. According to MPEP 214.02: For applications that have issued as patents, a petition filed under 37 CFR 1.55(e) or 1.78(c) and (e) may be filed as a reissue application, a request for certificate…
Read MoreWhat is the deadline for filing an unintentionally delayed priority claim?
The deadline for filing an unintentionally delayed priority claim is the later of: Four months from the actual filing date of the later-filed application, or Sixteen months from the filing date of the prior application This is stated in 37 CFR 1.55(d)(1) for foreign priority claims and 37 CFR 1.78(a)(4) for domestic benefit claims. However,…
Read MoreWhat is an unintentionally delayed priority claim?
An unintentionally delayed priority claim occurs when a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a) through (d) or (f), 365(a) or (b), or 386(a) or 386(b) is not presented within the time period provided by 37 CFR 1.55(d). In such cases, the claim is considered to have been waived but may be accepted if…
Read MoreWhat happens if a foreign priority claim is submitted after the time period set in 37 CFR 1.55?
If a foreign priority claim in an original application filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) (other than a design application) is submitted after the time period set in 37 CFR 1.55 and without a petition under 37 CFR 1.55, the examiner may notify the applicant that the foreign priority claim will not be entered. As stated…
Read MoreCan a US national application claim benefit of an international application that entered national stage in another country?
Can a US national application claim benefit of an international application that entered national stage in another country? Yes, a U.S. national application can claim the benefit of an international application that entered the national stage in another country, as long as certain conditions are met. The MPEP provides guidance on this: “A U.S. national…
Read MoreWhat is the time limit for filing a U.S. nonprovisional application claiming priority to a foreign application?
The time limit for filing a U.S. nonprovisional application claiming priority to a foreign application is generally 12 months from the filing date of the foreign application. For design applications, the time limit is 6 months. As stated in the MPEP, The United States nonprovisional application must be filed not later than twelve months (six…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO calculate the 12-month priority period for nonprovisional applications?
The USPTO calculates the 12-month priority period for nonprovisional applications as follows: Start date: The period begins on the filing date of the earliest foreign application for which priority is claimed. End date: The period ends 12 months later, on the same date of the following year. Holiday/weekend adjustment: If the 12-month period ends on…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO acknowledge receipt of timely and regular foreign priority claims?
When the claim for foreign priority and the certified copy of the foreign application are received within the time period set forth in 37 CFR 1.55, and there are no irregularities, the USPTO acknowledges receipt in the next Office action. According to the MPEP: Assuming that the papers are timely and regular in form and…
Read More