How does a terminal disclaimer affect a divisional application?

A terminal disclaimer filed in a parent application can affect a divisional application in specific ways. According to MPEP 201.06: ‘The divisional application must be directed to subject matter described and claimed in the prior nonprovisional application.’ This means that if a terminal disclaimer was filed in the parent application, it may impact the divisional…

Read More

What is the impact of a terminal disclaimer on claiming benefit of a prior-filed application?

What is the impact of a terminal disclaimer on claiming benefit of a prior-filed application? A terminal disclaimer can affect the ability to claim benefit of a prior-filed application. According to MPEP 211.01(b): Any nonprovisional application claiming the benefit of one or more prior-filed copending nonprovisional applications or international applications designating the United States must…

Read More

What happens to terminal disclaimers in a divisional application?

Terminal disclaimers filed in a parent application do not automatically carry over to a divisional application. The MPEP 201.06 states: ‘A terminal disclaimer filed to obviate a nonstatutory double patenting rejection in a parent application does not carry over to a divisional application. The applicant filing the divisional application must determine whether a new terminal…

Read More

What is the time limit for submitting a certified copy of the priority document in an international design application?

For international design applications designating the United States, there is generally no specific time limit for submitting a certified copy of the priority document. The MPEP 213.07 explains: ‘In accordance with Hague Agreement Rule 7(5)(f), a copy of the priority document may be submitted to the International Bureau within three months from the date of…

Read More