How often are ‘[Reserved]’ sections in the MPEP filled with content?
The frequency with which ‘[Reserved]’ sections in the MPEP, like MPEP 212, are filled with content varies and depends on the needs of the USPTO. These sections may be filled during regular MPEP updates, which typically occur several times a year, or may remain reserved for extended periods.
Read MoreWhat does it mean when an MPEP section is marked as [Reserved]?
When an MPEP section is marked as [Reserved], it indicates that the section number exists but there is currently no content provided for that section. The MPEP states in section 212: 212 [Reserved] [R-]
Read MoreShould patent attorneys or examiners be concerned about ‘[Reserved]’ sections like MPEP 212?
Patent attorneys and examiners generally do not need to be concerned about ‘[Reserved]’ sections like MPEP 212. These sections contain no substantive information and do not affect current patent examination procedures. However, it’s good practice to stay informed about MPEP updates in case reserved sections are filled with new content in the future.
Read MoreWhat is the significance of the ‘[R-]’ notation after MPEP 212 [Reserved]?
The ‘[R-]’ notation after ‘MPEP 212 [Reserved]’ typically indicates that this section has been revised. However, in this case, since the section is reserved and empty, the ‘[R-]’ may be a placeholder for future revision dates. When a substantive revision occurs, a date is usually added after the ‘R’, such as ‘[R-10.2019]’ to indicate an…
Read MoreWhat does ‘[Reserved]’ mean in MPEP 212?
The ‘[Reserved]’ designation in MPEP 212 indicates that this section is currently not in use but is being held for potential future content. It does not contain any specific information or guidance at this time.
Read MoreIs there any content in MPEP 212?
No, there is currently no content in MPEP 212. The section is marked as ‘[Reserved]’, which means it is empty and being held for potential future use.
Read MoreHow should priority papers be marked to ensure proper correlation with U.S. applications?
To ensure proper correlation between priority papers and U.S. applications, the MPEP suggests: “It is suggested that a notation of the application number of the corresponding U.S. application be placed on the priority papers when such papers are not submitted via a priority document exchange program. Such notation should be placed directly on the priority…
Read MoreWhat happens if I fail to make a timely priority claim or submit a certified copy?
If you fail to make a timely priority claim or submit a certified copy of the foreign application within the required time period, the following may occur: The right of priority may be considered waived The effective filing date of your application may be the actual U.S. filing date, not the foreign filing date Intervening…
Read MoreWhat is the most important aspect of an examiner’s action regarding a right of priority?
The most important aspect of an examiner’s action regarding a right of priority is determining the identity of invention between the U.S. and foreign applications. This involves: Considering the foreign application as if it had been filed in the U.S. on the same date it was filed in the foreign country Examining the foreign application…
Read MoreCan the inventorship in a continuation or continuation-in-part application differ from the parent application?
Yes, the inventorship in a continuation or continuation-in-part (CIP) application can differ from the parent application, but there are specific requirements: 1. For continuation applications: The inventorship must include at least one inventor named in the prior-filed application. 2. For CIP applications: The inventorship can change more significantly due to the addition of new matter.…
Read More