What does an examiner check when reviewing a claim to foreign priority?
When reviewing a claim to foreign priority, the examiner generally checks the following: That the papers contain no obvious formal defects That the papers correspond in number, date and country to the application identified in the application data sheet For original applications filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) and international applications entering the national stage under…
Read MoreHow should examiners review the identifying data of prior applications?
Examiners should review the identifying data of all prior applications for which benefits are claimed to ensure accuracy. This review includes: Checking that the data is provided in an application data sheet for applications filed on or after September 16, 2012 Verifying that the data is provided in either the first sentence(s) of the specification…
Read MoreHow does an examiner handle an intervening reference when a foreign priority claim is present?
When an examiner finds an intervening reference (a reference with an effective date between the foreign filing date and the U.S. filing date) and a foreign priority claim is present, the examiner follows these steps: If the certified copy of the priority papers has not been filed, the examiner rejects the claims that may be…
Read MoreWhen does an examiner consider the merits of a foreign priority claim?
An examiner considers the merits of a foreign priority claim in the following situations: When a reference is found with an effective date between the foreign filing date and the U.S. filing date When determining if a reference’s prior art date falls within the grace period for the application under examination When an interference situation…
Read MoreWhat should an examiner check on the bib-data sheet regarding prior applications?
An examiner should check the following on the bib-data sheet regarding prior applications: Accuracy of prior application data, including provisional application data Whether the application is copending with prior nonprovisional applications for which benefit is claimed Correct application numbers of provisional applications for which benefit is claimed Proper listing of foreign applications qualifying for benefits…
Read MoreWhat is the effect of filing a continuation or continuation-in-part application on the parent application?
Filing a continuation or continuation-in-part (CIP) application does not automatically affect the status of the parent application. The parent application continues to be examined or remains patented (if already issued) independently of the child application. Key points to note: 1. The parent application remains pending unless expressly abandoned, allowed to go abandoned, or issued as…
Read MoreCan a nonprovisional application be entitled to different foreign filing dates for different claims?
Yes, a nonprovisional application can be entitled to different foreign filing dates for different claims. This can occur in two scenarios: The application may be found entitled to the filing date of a foreign application for some claims but not for others. An applicant may rely on two or more different foreign applications and may…
Read MoreWhat is the difference between claiming foreign priority and claiming benefit of a U.S. provisional application?
Claiming foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d) and claiming benefit of a U.S. provisional application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) are similar in some ways but have important differences: 1. Time limit:– Foreign priority: Must be claimed within 12 months (6 months for design applications)– Provisional: Must be claimed within 12 months 2. Effective filing date:–…
Read MoreWhat is the difference between claiming priority and claiming benefit in patent applications?
Claiming priority and claiming benefit are two different mechanisms in patent law, though both can affect the effective filing date of a patent application: Claiming Priority: Typically refers to claiming the right of priority to a foreign application under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d) and (f) Also includes priority claims to provisional applications under 35 U.S.C. 119(e)…
Read MoreWhat is the difference in priority claim requirements for design applications compared to utility applications?
The main differences in priority claim requirements for design applications compared to utility applications are: Time limit: Design applications can claim priority at any time during pendency, while utility applications have specific deadlines Restoration of priority: Not applicable to design applications MPEP 214.01 states: “The time periods set forth in 37 CFR 1.55(d) do not…
Read More