What is the relationship between fraud in the original patent and a reissue application?
The MPEP clearly establishes a direct relationship between fraud in the original patent and any subsequent reissue application. It states: Clearly, “fraud” practiced or attempted in an application which issues as a patent is “fraud” practiced or attempted in connection with any subsequent application to reissue that patent. The reissue application and the patent are…
Read MoreHow does fraud or inequitable conduct affect reissue applications?
Fraud, inequitable conduct, or violation of duty of disclosure in the original patent application can significantly impact reissue applications. The MPEP states: “Fraud” cannot be purged through the reissue process. This means that if fraud was committed in the original application, it cannot be remedied by filing a reissue application. Furthermore, the MPEP notes: Clearly,…
Read MoreWhat is the impact of fraud, inequitable conduct, or violation of duty of disclosure on patent claims?
According to MPEP 2016, a finding of fraud, inequitable conduct, or violation of duty of disclosure affects all claims in a patent application or patent, rendering them unpatentable or invalid. The MPEP states: “A finding of ‘fraud,’ ‘inequitable conduct,’ or violation of duty of disclosure with respect to any claim in an application or patent,…
Read MoreWhat happens if fraud is discovered during a reissue application?
What happens if fraud is discovered during a reissue application? If fraud is discovered during the examination of a reissue application, the examiner must take specific actions. According to MPEP 2012: “Where the examiner discovers or is made aware of fraud during the examination of a reissue application, the examiner should consult with the Technology…
Read MoreHow does the duty of disclosure relate to patent enforceability?
The duty of disclosure is closely tied to patent enforceability. According to MPEP 2016, a violation of the duty of disclosure can lead to all claims in a patent being unenforceable. The section states: “A finding of ‘fraud,’ ‘inequitable conduct,’ or violation of duty of disclosure with respect to any claim in an application or…
Read MoreWhat are the consequences of inequitable conduct in patent prosecution?
The consequences of inequitable conduct in patent prosecution are severe. MPEP 2016 outlines that such conduct leads to the unenforceability of the entire patent. As stated in the J. P. Stevens & Co. v. Lex Tex Ltd. case: “Inequitable conduct ‘goes to the patent right as a whole, independently of particular claims.’” This means that…
Read MoreWhat is the rationale behind the ‘all or nothing’ approach to patent unenforceability?
The ‘all or nothing’ approach to patent unenforceability due to inequitable conduct is based on the principle that such misconduct affects the entire patent right. MPEP 2016 cites the Gemveto Jewelry Co. v. Lambert Bros., Inc. case, which explains: “The gravamen of the fraud defense is that the patentee has failed to discharge his duty…
Read More