What is the relationship between 35 U.S.C. 112(a) and (b)?
The requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112(a) and (b) are separate and distinct. As stated in the MPEP 2174: “The requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112(a) and (b) or the first and second paragraphs of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112 are separate and distinct.” This means that a patent application must satisfy both requirements independently. To learn more:…
Read MoreWhat happens if a critical feature is not included in the claims?
If a critical feature disclosed in the specification is not included in the claims, it may lead to a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112(a). The MPEP 2174 explains: “If the specification discloses that a particular feature or element is critical or essential to the practice of the invention, failure to recite or include that particular…
Read MoreCan a claim be rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) if the description is not commensurate with the claim scope?
No, a claim cannot be rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) solely because the description is not commensurate with the claim scope. The MPEP 2174 states: “If a description or the enabling disclosure of a specification is not commensurate in scope with the subject matter encompassed by a claim, that fact alone does not render the…
Read MoreCan amending a claim lead to a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112(a)?
Yes, amending a claim to include an invention not described in the original application can lead to a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112(a). The MPEP 2174 states: “If a claim is amended to include an invention that is not described in the application as filed, a rejection of that claim under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or…
Read More