What is the relationship between “other meaningful limitations” and the machine-or-transformation test?

The concept of “other meaningful limitations” in MPEP 2106.05(e) is related to, but distinct from, the machine-or-transformation test. Here’s how they are connected:

• The machine-or-transformation test is a useful tool for determining patent eligibility, but it is not the sole test.
• “Other meaningful limitations” can include elements that satisfy the machine-or-transformation test, such as applying the judicial exception with a particular machine or transforming an article to a different state or thing.
• However, “other meaningful limitations” are broader and can encompass additional ways of integrating an abstract idea into a practical application.

The MPEP notes: “While the machine-or-transformation test is an important clue to eligibility, it should not be used as a separate test for eligibility, but instead should be considered as part of the ‘integration’ determination or ‘significantly more’ determination.“

In essence, while passing the machine-or-transformation test can indicate the presence of other meaningful limitations, it is not the only way to demonstrate such limitations. The focus remains on whether the claim as a whole integrates the judicial exception into a practical application.

To learn more:

• meaningful limitations
• machine-or-transformation test
• patent eligibility
• practical application