How does the MPEP address utility disclosure in anticipatory references?
This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.
The MPEP 2122 explicitly addresses utility disclosure in anticipatory references, stating:
“UTILITY NEED NOT BE DISCLOSED IN REFERENCE”
This heading is followed by an explanation that a reference can be anticipatory without disclosing utility. The MPEP further clarifies:
“[N]o utility need be disclosed for a reference to be anticipatory of a claim to an old compound.”
This guidance emphasizes that the lack of a disclosed utility does not prevent a reference from being anticipatory, as long as it meets other criteria such as identically disclosing the claimed compound and teaching a process of making it.