What type of information can an examiner require under 37 CFR 1.105?
Under 37 CFR 1.105, an examiner can require information that is reasonably necessary to examine or treat a matter in an application. This includes:
- Information relevant to examination either procedurally or substantively
- Information beyond what is defined as material to patentability under 37 CFR 1.56
- Information that may not be directly useful to support a rejection or conclusively decide patentability
The MPEP cites the Star Fruits S.N.C. v. United States case, which states: “‘such information as may be reasonably necessary to properly examine or treat the matter,’ 37 C.F.R. 1.105(a)(1), contemplates information relevant to examination either procedurally or substantively. It includes a zone of information beyond that defined by section 1.56 as material to patentability, and beyond that which is directly useful to support a rejection or conclusively decide the issue of patentability.”
To learn more:
Topics:
MPEP 2000 - Duty Of Disclosure,
MPEP 2005 - Comparison To Requirements For Information,
Patent Law,
Patent Procedure