What are the exceptions to prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)?

35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2) provides three important exceptions to what would otherwise be considered prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2). The MPEP outlines these exceptions:

  1. 102(b)(2)(A): “limits the use of an inventor’s own work as prior art, when the inventor’s own work is disclosed in a U.S. patent, U.S. patent application publication, or WIPO published application by another who obtained the subject matter directly or indirectly from the inventor or joint inventor.”
  2. 102(b)(2)(B): “excepts as prior art subject matter that was effectively filed by another after the subject matter had been publicly disclosed by the inventor, a joint inventor, or another who obtained the subject matter directly or indirectly from the inventor or joint inventor.”
  3. 102(b)(2)(C): “excepts subject matter disclosed in a U.S. patent, U.S. patent application publication, or WIPO published application from constituting prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) if the subject matter disclosed and the claimed invention, not later than the effective filing date of the claimed invention, ‘were owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person.'”

These exceptions provide important protections for inventors and applicants in various scenarios involving disclosures and ownership of inventions.

To learn more:

Topics: MPEP 2100 - Patentability, MPEP 2152.05 - Determining Whether To Apply 35 U.S.C. 102(A)(1) Or 102(A)(2), Patent Law, Patent Procedure
Tags: 102(B)(2), common ownership, Inventor's Own Work, prior art exceptions, public disclosure