Can a patent specification be enabling without describing the invention?
Yes, it is possible for a patent specification to be enabling without fully describing the invention. The MPEP 2161 provides an example of this situation:
“A disclosure could be enabling without describing the invention (e.g., a specification describing a method of making and using a paint composition made of functionally defined ingredients within broad ranges would be enabling for formulations falling within the description but would not describe any specific formulation).”
This example illustrates that a specification might provide enough information for a person skilled in the art to make and use the invention (thus satisfying the enablement requirement) without providing a specific description of the invention itself (potentially failing the written description requirement).
It’s important to note that while this situation is possible, a patent application must still satisfy both the enablement and written description requirements to be compliant with 35 U.S.C. 112(a). The MPEP emphasizes that these are separate and distinct requirements, citing Ariad Pharm., Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co.:
“If Congress had intended enablement to be the sole description requirement of § 112, first paragraph, the statute would have been written differently.”
Therefore, while a specification can theoretically be enabling without fully describing the invention, both requirements must be met for a patent application to be valid.
To learn more: