How are non-elected claims handled after a Board decision?

When handling non-elected claims after a Board decision:

  1. If elected claims are in condition for allowance, non-elected claims should be considered for rejoinder.
  2. If the Board reverses all rejections of a generic claim, pending claims drawn to non-elected species must be acted upon.
  3. Exception: If the examiner reopens prosecution with a new ground of rejection of the generic claim and determines the election of species is still appropriate.

The MPEP states: If, upon review of the decision of the Board, the elected claims are in condition for allowance and the application contains claims directed to a non-elected invention, whether the election was made with or without traverse, the non-elected invention should be considered for rejoinder.

To learn more:

Tags: board decision, Generic Claims, non-elected claims, rejoinder, species claims