How is a premature final rejection different from the tenability of a rejection?

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-10

This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.

The prematureness of a final rejection is distinct from the tenability (validity) of the rejection itself. As stated in MPEP 706.07(c):

This is purely a question of practice, wholly distinct from the tenability of the rejection.

In other words:

  • Prematureness refers to whether the applicant has been given a fair opportunity to respond to the rejection before it was made final.
  • Tenability refers to whether the substantive reasons for the rejection are valid and well-founded.

An applicant can challenge the prematureness of a final rejection without necessarily disputing the underlying reasons for the rejection.

Tags: final rejection, patent examination, Premature Final Rejection, Tenability