What should patent practitioners avoid when inquiring about supplemental examinations?

Patent practitioners should avoid making improper inquiries to USPTO personnel regarding specific supplemental examination proceedings. The MPEP 2803.01 advises: “Patent practitioners (or other members of the public) must not address improper inquiries to members of the patent examining corps and to the Office as a whole.” Improper inquiries include questions about whether certain evidence was considered or would have raised a substantial new question of patentability in a specific case. Practitioners should understand that refusal to answer such inquiries is not discourteous but a necessary part of maintaining the integrity of the examination process.

To learn more:

Topics: MPEP 2800 - Supplemental Examination, MPEP 2803.01 - Inquiries From Persons Other Than The Patent Owner, Patent Law, Patent Procedure
Tags: Improper Inquiries, Patent Practitioners, supplemental examination, USPTO communication