How does the USPTO handle non-Latin character patent documents?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-27 3 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. The USPTO has specific guidelines for handling non-Latin character patent documents. The MPEP states: “ In citing a document published by a foreign patent office, identify the foreign country or WIPO by the two-letter code (WIPO Standard ST.3) before the first document number. “ For non-Latin character documents: The country code helps identify the origin, regardless of the script used English translations or transliterations may be provided when available Examiners may rely on machine translations for initial screening This approach ensures that important prior art is not overlooked due to language barriers. Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 3 rules Collapse Requirement for Examiner's Action Under 1.104(a)(1) MPEP 901 Concise Description of Relevance Must Be Provided for Third-Party Submissions MPEP 1134.01 Same Prior Art for Reissue as Original MPEP 1440 Permitted Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse Can an abandoned application be used as prior art? What are the exceptions to the 18-month publication rule for patent applications? What is the significance of abandoned applications in patent examination? How should foreign patents and foreign published applications be cited? What information should be included when citing U.S. patent documents?