How does the concept of field of use relate to the step 2B analysis in the Alice/Mayo test?
The concept of field of use is particularly relevant to the Step 2B analysis in the Alice/Mayo test for patent eligibility. According to MPEP 2106.05(h):
“Another consideration when determining whether a claim integrates the judicial exception into a practical application in Step 2A Prong Two or recites significantly more than a judicial exception in Step 2B is whether the additional elements amount to more than generally linking the use of a judicial exception to a particular technological environment or field of use.”
In Step 2B, examiners evaluate whether the claim recites additional elements that amount to significantly more than the judicial exception. Limitations that merely indicate a field of use or technological environment in which to apply the judicial exception do not amount to significantly more.
For example, in Parker v. Flook, the Supreme Court found that limiting the use of a mathematical formula to the petrochemical and oil-refining fields was not sufficient to make the claim eligible. The Court reasoned that this limitation was merely an incidental addition to the claim that did not alter how the process steps were performed.
Therefore, when analyzing claims in Step 2B, examiners must carefully consider whether any additional elements genuinely add significantly more to the abstract idea or merely limit its application to a particular field or environment.
To learn more: