What information from copending U.S. patent applications needs to be disclosed?
Individuals covered by 37 CFR 1.56 must disclose information about copending U.S. patent applications that are “material to patentability” of the application in question. This includes: Identification of pending or abandoned applications filed by at least one of the inventors or assigned to the same assignee Applications that disclose similar subject matter Prior art references…
Read MoreWhat happens if copending applications have no common inventor, applicant, or assignee?
When copending applications have no common inventor, applicant, or assignee, the treatment differs. MPEP 2154.01(d) states: “If there is no common assignee, common applicant, or common (joint) inventor and the application was not published pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 122(b), the confidential status of applications under 35 U.S.C. 122(a) must be maintained and no rejection can…
Read MoreWhat are the consequences of failing to disclose material information from copending applications?
What are the consequences of failing to disclose material information from copending applications? Failing to disclose material information from copending applications can have serious consequences. According to MPEP 2001.06(b): “The examiner, and by inference the applicant, is charged with knowledge of the existence of the copending application.” This means that if material information from a…
Read MoreWhat are the consequences of failing to disclose material information about copending applications?
What are the consequences of failing to disclose material information about copending applications? Failing to disclose material information about copending applications can have serious consequences. While MPEP 2001.06(b) does not explicitly state the consequences, it’s important to understand the potential outcomes: Inequitable conduct: Failure to disclose material information could be considered inequitable conduct, which may…
Read MoreWhat are the grounds for filing a reissue application?
A reissue application is filed to correct an error in the patent that makes it wholly or partly inoperative or invalid. The MPEP states: There must be at least one error in the patent to provide grounds for reissue of the patent. If there is no error in the patent, the patent will not be…
Read MoreWhat is Form Paragraph 8.29 used for in patent examination?
Form Paragraph 8.29 is used by patent examiners when they encounter patentably indistinct claims in copending applications. According to MPEP 822, “Form paragraph 8.29 should be used when the conflicting claims are identical or conceded by applicant not to be patentably distinct.” The form paragraph states: Claim [1] of this application is patentably indistinct from…
Read MoreWhat does ‘termination of proceedings’ mean in patent law?
‘Termination of proceedings’ is a legal concept in patent law, specifically mentioned in 35 U.S.C. 120. It refers to the end of patent application processing under certain circumstances. The MPEP states: ‘Termination of proceedings’ is an expression found in 35 U.S.C. 120. As there stated, a second application is considered to be copending with an…
Read More