How does the USPTO process a patent term extension application?
The USPTO follows a specific process for handling patent term extension applications under 35 U.S.C. 156. According to the MPEP, the process includes the following steps: The USPTO initially determines whether the application is formally complete and whether the patent is eligible for extension. The Director of the USPTO notifies the Secretary of Agriculture or…
Read MoreWhat happens if a patent is determined to be ineligible for term extension?
If the USPTO determines that a patent is ineligible for term extension during the preliminary review process, the following action is taken: The MPEP clearly states: “In the interest of efficiency, if the patent is determined to be ineligible for patent term extension, the Office will dismiss the application rather than request a determination of…
Read MoreWhat happens to other USPTO proceedings during an interference?
When an interference is initiated, other proceedings within the USPTO for the involved file are generally suspended. The MPEP 2307 clearly states: “Other proceedings for the involved file within the Office are suspended except as the Board may order.” This suspension ensures that the Board has exclusive control over the involved file during the interference.…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle biological deposits made after the application filing date?
The USPTO has specific procedures for handling biological deposits made after the application filing date. According to MPEP 2407.01: “For biological inventions, for which evidence of reduction to practice via a biological deposit is required, there is a further requirement that the deposit be made within a specified period after the filing date of the…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle applications with sequence listings that do not comply with 37 CFR 1.821-1.825?
The USPTO has specific procedures for handling applications with non-compliant sequence listings, as outlined in MPEP 2422.07: If the application is accepted for filing but the sequence listing is found to be non-compliant, the applicant will be notified. The applicant will be given a time period (usually two months) to submit a compliant “Sequence Listing.”…
Read MoreHow are NASA and DoE ownership contests handled by the USPTO?
NASA and DoE ownership contests are handled by the USPTO using procedures similar to patent interferences. The MPEP 2309 states: “Although these cases are not interferences, the interference practices in this chapter generally apply to NASA and DoE ownership contests as well.” The process involves collaboration between various USPTO departments: The examiner works in coordination…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO prioritize reexamination proceedings and reissue applications?
The USPTO prioritizes reexamination proceedings and reissue applications as follows: Highest Priority: Cases involved in litigation (both reexamination proceedings and reissue applications) Second Priority: Reexamination proceedings not involved in litigation Lower Priority: All other cases As stated in MPEP 2661: “Any cases involved in litigation, whether they are reexamination proceedings or reissue applications, will have…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle prior art rejections when operability is questioned?
The USPTO handles prior art rejections where operability is questioned as follows: The examiner must provide a reasonable basis to question the operability of the prior art. If operability is questioned, the burden shifts to the applicant to provide rebuttal evidence. The prior art is presumed to be operable unless proven otherwise. As stated in…
Read MoreDoes the USPTO return or preserve the computer readable form (CRF) submitted on read-only optical discs?
No, the USPTO does not permanently preserve or return computer readable forms (CRFs) submitted on read-only optical discs. The MPEP clearly states: The Office does not desire to be bound by a requirement to permanently preserve computer readable forms submitted on read-only optical disc(s) for support, priority or correction purposes. Thus, once use of the…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO make a preliminary eligibility decision for patent term extension?
The USPTO makes a preliminary eligibility decision for patent term extension through the following process: The USPTO sends an initial letter to the relevant regulatory agency requesting information on eligibility. Upon receiving a reply from the regulatory agency, the USPTO reviews the information provided. The USPTO compares the regulatory agency’s information with the details in…
Read More