How does the USPTO treat admissions under the AIA?

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) continues to treat admissions by applicants as prior art under the America Invents Act (AIA). This approach is consistent with pre-AIA practice. According to MPEP 2152.03: “The Office will continue to treat admissions by the applicant as prior art under the AIA.” This means that any statement…

Read More

What is the time frame for the USPTO to issue a supplemental examination certificate?

The USPTO has a specific time frame for issuing a supplemental examination certificate. According to MPEP 2816: “The Office will issue a supplemental examination certificate within three months of the filing date of the request.” This three-month period is statutorily mandated by 35 U.S.C. 257(a). The certificate will indicate whether the items of information presented…

Read More

What is the time frame for the USPTO to determine if a Substantial New Question (SNQ) of patentability is raised in a supplemental examination request?

According to MPEP 2816, the USPTO is required to make a determination within three months following the filing date of a request for supplemental examination. Specifically, the MPEP states: “35 U.S.C. 257(a) and 37 CFR 1.620(b) require that, within three months following the filing date of a request for supplemental examination, the Office will determine…

Read More

How does the USPTO conclude a supplemental examination proceeding?

A supplemental examination proceeding concludes with the issuance of a specific document. According to MPEP 2815: “A supplemental examination proceeding concludes with the issuance of a supplemental examination certificate, indicating the results of the examiner’s determination.” This certificate serves as the official record of the examiner’s determination regarding whether a substantial new question of patentability…

Read More

What is the USPTO’s stance on rejecting patent claims for “aggregation”?

According to the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) 2173.05(k), patent claims should not be rejected on the grounds of “aggregation.” The MPEP states: “A claim should not be rejected on the ground of ‘aggregation.’” This guidance is based on legal precedents, including In re Gustafson and In re Collier, which established that rejections for…

Read More

How does the USPTO handle the timing of reexamination proceedings?

The USPTO is required to conduct reexamination proceedings with special dispatch. MPEP 2821 references 35 U.S.C. 305, which states: “Reexamination will be conducted with special dispatch within the Office.“ This requirement ensures that reexamination proceedings are handled promptly and efficiently. The MPEP also cites the case of Ethicon v. Quigg, 849 F.2d 1422 (Fed. Cir.…

Read More