What is the difference between recording and registering a patent assignment?
What is the difference between recording and registering a patent assignment? Recording and registering a patent assignment are two distinct processes: Recording refers to submitting the assignment document to the USPTO for public notice. As stated in MPEP 302, ‘The recording of the assignment document in the USPTO is merely a ministerial act and does…
Read MoreWhat happens if a patent assignment is not recorded with the USPTO?
What happens if a patent assignment is not recorded with the USPTO? Failing to record a patent assignment with the USPTO can have significant consequences: Lack of Constructive Notice: Third parties may not be aware of the ownership transfer. Potential Legal Issues: It may affect the assignee’s ability to enforce the patent or recover damages…
Read MoreCan a patent assignment be recorded electronically?
Can a patent assignment be recorded electronically? Yes, patent assignments can be recorded electronically. The USPTO provides an electronic system for recording assignment documents. According to MPEP 302: ‘Assignment documents can be submitted for recordation via the Office’s Electronic Patent Assignment System (EPAS). See the USPTO website at http://www.uspto.gov/patents-application-process/documenting-patent-ownership/epas-electronic-patent-assignment-system for additional information regarding EPAS.’ Electronic…
Read MoreWhen should an inventor consider filing a continuation application?
An inventor might consider filing a continuation application in several scenarios. The MPEP 201.07 provides guidance on timing: At any time before the patenting, abandonment, or termination of proceedings on an earlier application, an applicant may have recourse to filing a continuation application under 37 CFR 1.53(b) in order to introduce into the application a…
Read MoreAre provisional applications considered national applications?
Provisional applications are not explicitly mentioned as national applications in MPEP 201.01. The section states: ‘National applications include original (nonprovisional) applications, reissue applications, and reexamination proceedings.’ While provisional applications are filed with the USPTO, they are not considered complete patent applications and do not undergo examination. They serve as a placeholder to establish a priority…
Read MoreHow does a U.S. national stage application differ from a regular national application?
How does a U.S. national stage application differ from a regular national application? A U.S. national stage application is derived from an international application, while a regular national application is filed directly with the USPTO. The key differences lie in their origins and the legal provisions governing them. As stated in MPEP 201.01: A national…
Read MoreWhat types of national applications can be filed with the USPTO?
What types of national applications can be filed with the USPTO? The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) accepts several types of national applications. These include: Utility patent applications: For new and useful processes, machines, articles of manufacture, or compositions of matter. Design patent applications: For new, original, and ornamental designs for articles of…
Read MoreHow does a PCT application become a national application?
A Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) application can become a national application in the United States when certain conditions are met. According to MPEP 201.01: ‘An international application filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty in which the basic national fee under 35 U.S.C. 41(a)(1)(F) has been paid’ becomes a national application. This process, known as ‘national…
Read MoreWhat information should be included in a CPA request?
When filing a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) request, certain key information must be included. Based on MPEP ¶ 2.35, the following details are essential: The filing date of the CPA request The application number of the prior application The MPEP states: “Receipt is acknowledged of the ‘conditional’ request for a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) filed…
Read MoreWhat information should be included in a request to delete a named inventor in a CPA?
When requesting to delete a named inventor in a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) for a design patent, you should include specific information. According to MPEP ¶ 2.32, the request should contain: A clear statement requesting the deletion of the inventor(s) The name(s) of the inventor(s) to be deleted The filing date of the CPA The…
Read More