How does the ‘unintentional’ delay standard apply to delayed benefit claims?

The ‘unintentional’ delay standard is crucial in evaluating petitions for delayed benefit claims. According to MPEP 211.04: While the Director may require additional information whenever there is a question of whether the delay was unintentional, a person filing a petition to accept a delayed benefit claim more than two years after the date the benefit…

Read More

What are the requirements for filing a delayed benefit claim for a provisional application?

Filing a delayed benefit claim for a provisional application requires specific components. MPEP 211.04 outlines the requirements: The petition must be accompanied by: (A) the reference required by 35 U.S.C. 119(e) and 37 CFR 1.78 to the prior provisional application (unless previously submitted); (B) a petition fee under 37 CFR 1.17(m); and (C) a statement…

Read More

What does ‘unintentional delay’ mean in the context of restoring provisional application benefit?

‘Unintentional delay’ is a crucial concept when seeking to restore the benefit of a provisional application. The MPEP requires: “A statement that the delay in filing the subsequent nonprovisional application or international application designating the United States within the twelve-month period was unintentional.” While the MPEP doesn’t provide a specific definition of ‘unintentional delay’, it…

Read More

How can an applicant restore the right of priority if the U.S. application is filed after the 12-month deadline?

An applicant can restore the right of priority if the U.S. application is filed after the 12-month deadline (or 6-month deadline for design applications) but within 2 months of the expiration of that period. This can be done through a petition process, provided the delay was unintentional. According to MPEP 213.03: “As provided in 37…

Read More