Can replacement drawings be rejected for containing new matter?

Yes, replacement drawings can be rejected if they contain new matter. The MPEP 608.02(h) states that when reviewing replacement drawings, examiners should not overlook “such factors as new matter, the necessity for the replacement sheets and consistency with other sheets.” If an examiner identifies new matter in the replacement drawings, they may decide not to…

Read More

What is the applicant’s responsibility when submitting replacement drawings after allowance?

When submitting replacement drawings after allowance, the applicant has a crucial responsibility: It is applicant’s responsibility to see that no new matter is added when submitting replacement drawings after allowance because they will not normally be reviewed by an examiner. This means that applicants must ensure that any changes made to the drawings do not…

Read More

What is the process for reviewing an examiner’s new matter rejection in the specification?

When an examiner issues a new matter rejection confined to amendments in the specification, the process for review is through a petition. This is distinct from new matter rejections in claims, which require an appeal. According to MPEP 608.04(c): “Where the new matter is confined to amendments to the specification, review of the examiner’s requirement…

Read More

What constitutes inherent characteristics in patent applications?

What constitutes inherent characteristics in patent applications? Inherent characteristics in patent applications refer to properties or features that are necessarily present in the invention but may not be explicitly stated in the original disclosure. MPEP 608.04(a) provides guidance on this: ‘Inherent characteristics of materials and properties of processes are not considered to be new matter.’…

Read More