What are some examples that may not be sufficient to show an improvement in computer-functionality?

The MPEP provides several examples that courts have indicated may not be sufficient to show an improvement in computer-functionality. According to MPEP 2106.05(a), these include:

• Generating restaurant menus with functionally claimed features
• Accelerating a process of analyzing audit log data when the increased speed comes solely from the capabilities of a general-purpose computer
• Mere automation of manual processes using generic computer components
• Recording, transmitting, and archiving digital images by use of conventional or generic technology
• Affixing a barcode to a mail object without specifying technical details of the barcode or how it’s generated
• Displaying two sets of information on a computer display without specifying how to achieve the desired result
• Providing historical usage information to users while inputting data
• Arranging transactional information on a graphical user interface

These examples typically involve using a computer as a tool to perform an existing process or implementing an abstract idea on a computer without improving its functionality.

To learn more:

• computer functionality
• patent eligibility
• insufficient improvements
• abstract ideas