How does the USPTO define ‘composition of matter’ for patent eligibility?
How does the USPTO define ‘composition of matter’ for patent eligibility? The USPTO defines ‘composition of matter’ as one of the four categories of patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. According to the MPEP 2106.03: “Compositions of matter” are chemical compounds, mechanical mixtures, gases, and other materials. This category encompasses: Chemical compounds (e.g.,…
Read MoreWhat is the role of “other meaningful limitations” in overcoming patent eligibility rejections?
“Other meaningful limitations” play a crucial role in overcoming patent eligibility rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 101. According to MPEP 2106.05(e), these limitations can help transform an otherwise abstract idea into patent-eligible subject matter. Here’s how they function: They integrate the judicial exception (abstract idea) into a practical application. They impose meaningful limits on the…
Read MoreWhat are the differences between machines and manufactures as patent-eligible subject matter?
What are the differences between machines and manufactures as patent-eligible subject matter? Machines and manufactures are two of the four categories of patent-eligible subject matter defined in 35 U.S.C. § 101. While both are tangible inventions, they differ in their nature: Machines: Concrete things consisting of parts or devices. The MPEP states, “A machine is…
Read MoreWhat are the four categories of statutory subject matter in patent law?
What are the four categories of statutory subject matter in patent law? The four categories of statutory subject matter in patent law, as defined in 35 U.S.C. § 101, are: Process Machine Manufacture Composition of matter As stated in the MPEP 2106.03: “The Supreme Court has acknowledged that Congress intended statutory subject matter to ‘include…
Read More