Why does the USPTO prohibit “sounding out” interviews with patent examiners?
The USPTO prohibits “sounding out” interviews to ensure efficient use of examiner time and resources, and to promote substantive, binding discussions. According to MPEP 713.03:
“Interviews that are solely for the purpose of ‘sounding out’ the examiner, as by a local attorney acting for an out-of-town attorney, should not be permitted when it is apparent that any agreement that would be reached is conditional upon being satisfactory to the principal attorney.”
This policy serves several purposes:
- Prevents wasted time on non-binding discussions
- Ensures that interviews lead to concrete progress in patent prosecution
- Discourages the use of interviews merely as fact-finding missions
- Promotes efficient use of USPTO resources
To learn more: