Patent Law FAQ

This FAQ answers all your questions about patent law, patent procedure, and the patent examination process.

Here’s the complete FAQ:

c Expand All C Collapse All

MPEP 130-Examination of Secrecy Order Cases (2)

According to 37 CFR 5.1(d), an applicant must take one of three actions to prevent abandonment of a national security classified patent application without a Secrecy Order. The MPEP states: Pursuant to 37 CFR 5.1(d), if no Secrecy Order has issued in a national security classified patent application, the Office will set a time period within which the applicant must take one of the following three actions in order to prevent abandonment of the application: (A) obtain a Secrecy Order; (B) declassify the application; or (C) submit evidence of a good faith effort to obtain a Secrecy Order pursuant to 37 CFR 5.2(a). These actions ensure proper handling of potentially sensitive information.

For more information on patent abandonment, visit: patent abandonment.

If an examiner comes across a patent application that contains national security markings but does not have a Secrecy Order imposed, MPEP 130 instructs that “the examiner should require the applicant to seek imposition of a Secrecy Order or authority to cancel the markings.” This should be done preferably with the first office action and before final disposition of the application.

37 CFR 5.1(d) states that if no Secrecy Order has issued, the USPTO will set a time period for the applicant to take one of three actions to prevent abandonment:

  1. Obtain a Secrecy Order
  2. Declassify the application
  3. Submit evidence of a good faith effort to obtain a Secrecy Order under 37 CFR 5.2(a)

Additionally, per 37 CFR 5.1(e), “a national security classified patent application will not be allowed until the application is declassified and any Secrecy Order pursuant to 37 CFR 5.2(a) has been rescinded.”

MPEP 150-Statements to DOE and NASA (1)

When the USPTO makes a formal request for a property rights statement in accordance with 42 U.S.C. 2182 (DOE) or 51 U.S.C. 20135 (NASA), the applicant has a 30-day statutory period to respond. There is no provision for an extension of this 30-day time period.

As stated in MPEP 150, “If no proper and timely statement is received, the application will be held abandoned and the applicant so notified. Such applications may be revived under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.137.”

MPEP 200 - Types and Status of Application; Benefit and Priority (1)

An abandoned patent application is one that has been removed from the USPTO’s docket of pending applications. According to MPEP 203.05, an application can become abandoned for several reasons:

An abandoned application is, inter alia, one which is removed from the Office docket of pending applications:

  • Formal abandonment by the applicant or their attorney/agent
  • Failure to take appropriate action during prosecution
  • Failure to pay the issue fee
  • For provisional applications, not filing a nonprovisional application within 12 months

Abandonment can have serious consequences, but in some cases, it may be possible to revive an abandoned application.

For more information on patent abandonment, visit: patent abandonment.

MPEP 200 - Types and Status of Application; Benefit and Priority Claims (5)

A provisional patent application is considered abandoned no later than 12 months after its filing date. MPEP 203.05 states that an abandoned application includes, in the case of a provisional application, no later than 12 months after the filing date of the provisional application (see MPEP ยง 711.03(c) and 35 U.S.C. 111(b)(5)). This means that provisional applications have a statutory life of one year from their filing date, after which they are automatically abandoned if not converted to a nonprovisional application or claimed as priority in a nonprovisional application.

For more information, you can refer to MPEP ยง 711.03(c) and 35 U.S.C. 111(b)(5).

Once a nonprovisional patent application has been examined and determined to meet all statutory requirements, a notice of allowance is sent to the applicant. The status of the application is then considered “allowed” or “in issue”. As per MPEP 203.04:

An “allowed” nonprovisional application or an application “in issue” is one which has been examined and determined to meet all statutory requirements, and in which a notice of allowance has been sent to the applicant. Its status as an “allowed” application continues from the date of the notice of allowance until it issues as a patent, unless it is withdrawn from issue (37 CFR 1.313), or becomes abandoned for failure to pay the issue fee and any required publication fee (37 CFR 1.314 and 1.316).

A nonprovisional patent application is designated as “rejected” if, during prosecution before allowance, it contains an examiner’s action that has not been replied to by the applicant. As stated in MPEP 203.02:

A nonprovisional application which, during its prosecution in the examining group and before allowance, contains an unanswered examiner’s action is designated as a “rejected” application. Its status as a “rejected” application continues as such until acted upon by the applicant in reply to the examiner’s action (within the allotted reply period), or until it becomes abandoned.

According to MPEP 203.05, there are four main reasons for patent application abandonment:

  1. Formal abandonment by the applicant or their representative
  2. Failure of the applicant to take appropriate action during prosecution
  3. Failure to pay the issue fee
  4. For provisional applications, the passage of 12 months from the filing date

The MPEP states: An abandoned application is, inter alia, one which is removed from the Office docket of pending applications: (A) through formal abandonment by the applicant or by the attorney or agent of record; (B) through failure of applicant to take appropriate action at some stage in the prosecution of a nonprovisional application; (C) for failure to pay the issue fee (MPEP ยง 711 to ยง 711.05); or (D) in the case of a provisional application, no later than 12 months after the filing date of the provisional application.

Yes, failure to pay the issue fee can result in an abandoned patent application. MPEP 203.05 explicitly states that an abandoned application includes one removed from the Office docket for failure to pay the issue fee (MPEP ยง 711 to ยง 711.05). This means that even if an application has been approved for issuance, if the applicant fails to pay the required issue fee within the specified time frame, the application will be considered abandoned.

For more detailed information on this topic, you can refer to MPEP ยง 711 to ยง 711.05.

MPEP 203 - Status of Applications (6)

A provisional patent application is considered abandoned no later than 12 months after its filing date. MPEP 203.05 states that an abandoned application includes, in the case of a provisional application, no later than 12 months after the filing date of the provisional application (see MPEP ยง 711.03(c) and 35 U.S.C. 111(b)(5)). This means that provisional applications have a statutory life of one year from their filing date, after which they are automatically abandoned if not converted to a nonprovisional application or claimed as priority in a nonprovisional application.

For more information, you can refer to MPEP ยง 711.03(c) and 35 U.S.C. 111(b)(5).

Once a nonprovisional patent application has been examined and determined to meet all statutory requirements, a notice of allowance is sent to the applicant. The status of the application is then considered “allowed” or “in issue”. As per MPEP 203.04:

An “allowed” nonprovisional application or an application “in issue” is one which has been examined and determined to meet all statutory requirements, and in which a notice of allowance has been sent to the applicant. Its status as an “allowed” application continues from the date of the notice of allowance until it issues as a patent, unless it is withdrawn from issue (37 CFR 1.313), or becomes abandoned for failure to pay the issue fee and any required publication fee (37 CFR 1.314 and 1.316).

An abandoned patent application is one that has been removed from the USPTO’s docket of pending applications. According to MPEP 203.05, an application can become abandoned for several reasons:

An abandoned application is, inter alia, one which is removed from the Office docket of pending applications:

  • Formal abandonment by the applicant or their attorney/agent
  • Failure to take appropriate action during prosecution
  • Failure to pay the issue fee
  • For provisional applications, not filing a nonprovisional application within 12 months

Abandonment can have serious consequences, but in some cases, it may be possible to revive an abandoned application.

For more information on patent abandonment, visit: patent abandonment.

A nonprovisional patent application is designated as “rejected” if, during prosecution before allowance, it contains an examiner’s action that has not been replied to by the applicant. As stated in MPEP 203.02:

A nonprovisional application which, during its prosecution in the examining group and before allowance, contains an unanswered examiner’s action is designated as a “rejected” application. Its status as a “rejected” application continues as such until acted upon by the applicant in reply to the examiner’s action (within the allotted reply period), or until it becomes abandoned.

According to MPEP 203.05, there are four main reasons for patent application abandonment:

  1. Formal abandonment by the applicant or their representative
  2. Failure of the applicant to take appropriate action during prosecution
  3. Failure to pay the issue fee
  4. For provisional applications, the passage of 12 months from the filing date

The MPEP states: An abandoned application is, inter alia, one which is removed from the Office docket of pending applications: (A) through formal abandonment by the applicant or by the attorney or agent of record; (B) through failure of applicant to take appropriate action at some stage in the prosecution of a nonprovisional application; (C) for failure to pay the issue fee (MPEP ยง 711 to ยง 711.05); or (D) in the case of a provisional application, no later than 12 months after the filing date of the provisional application.

Yes, failure to pay the issue fee can result in an abandoned patent application. MPEP 203.05 explicitly states that an abandoned application includes one removed from the Office docket for failure to pay the issue fee (MPEP ยง 711 to ยง 711.05). This means that even if an application has been approved for issuance, if the applicant fails to pay the required issue fee within the specified time frame, the application will be considered abandoned.

For more detailed information on this topic, you can refer to MPEP ยง 711 to ยง 711.05.

MPEP 500 - Receipt and Handling of Mail and Papers (3)

If the drawings in a patent application are not in compliance with the rules, the Office of Patent Application Processing (OPAP) will send a Notice to File Corrected Application Papers. This notice gives the applicant a time period of 2 months from the mailing date to file corrected drawings. The time period is extendable under 37 CFR 1.136(a). If corrected drawings are not timely filed, the application will be held abandoned.

If a drawing is not acceptable for publication, the Office of Patent Application Processing (OPAP) will object to the drawing and notify the applicant. The applicant will be given a time period of two months from the mail date of the Notice to file acceptable drawings. This period is extendable under 37 CFR 1.136(a) or (b) for patent applications filed under 35 U.S.C. 111, but not for design applications filed under 35 U.S.C. 171. Failure to comply with the Notice within the time period will result in abandonment of the application.

The consequences of not responding to a notice about an unlocatable file differ for pending applications and granted patents:

  • For pending applications: According to 37 CFR 1.251(b), failure to comply with one of paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(3) of this section within the time period set in the notice will result in abandonment of the application.
  • For granted patents: While the patent won’t expire, the MPEP states that the only certified copy of the patent file that the Office will be able to produce will be a copy of the patent and a copy of the application-as-filed (which may have an adverse impact during attempts to enforce the patent).

Additionally, for patents involved in USPTO proceedings, the Office may take action under 37 CFR 41.128 or 37 CFR 11.18.

To learn more:

MPEP 507 - Drawing Review in the Office of Patent Application Processing (2)

If the drawings in a patent application are not in compliance with the rules, the Office of Patent Application Processing (OPAP) will send a Notice to File Corrected Application Papers. This notice gives the applicant a time period of 2 months from the mailing date to file corrected drawings. The time period is extendable under 37 CFR 1.136(a). If corrected drawings are not timely filed, the application will be held abandoned.

If a drawing is not acceptable for publication, the Office of Patent Application Processing (OPAP) will object to the drawing and notify the applicant. The applicant will be given a time period of two months from the mail date of the Notice to file acceptable drawings. This period is extendable under 37 CFR 1.136(a) or (b) for patent applications filed under 35 U.S.C. 111, but not for design applications filed under 35 U.S.C. 171. Failure to comply with the Notice within the time period will result in abandonment of the application.

Patent Law (13)

A provisional patent application is considered abandoned no later than 12 months after its filing date. MPEP 203.05 states that an abandoned application includes, in the case of a provisional application, no later than 12 months after the filing date of the provisional application (see MPEP ยง 711.03(c) and 35 U.S.C. 111(b)(5)). This means that provisional applications have a statutory life of one year from their filing date, after which they are automatically abandoned if not converted to a nonprovisional application or claimed as priority in a nonprovisional application.

For more information, you can refer to MPEP ยง 711.03(c) and 35 U.S.C. 111(b)(5).

When the USPTO makes a formal request for a property rights statement in accordance with 42 U.S.C. 2182 (DOE) or 51 U.S.C. 20135 (NASA), the applicant has a 30-day statutory period to respond. There is no provision for an extension of this 30-day time period.

As stated in MPEP 150, “If no proper and timely statement is received, the application will be held abandoned and the applicant so notified. Such applications may be revived under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.137.”

Once a nonprovisional patent application has been examined and determined to meet all statutory requirements, a notice of allowance is sent to the applicant. The status of the application is then considered “allowed” or “in issue”. As per MPEP 203.04:

An “allowed” nonprovisional application or an application “in issue” is one which has been examined and determined to meet all statutory requirements, and in which a notice of allowance has been sent to the applicant. Its status as an “allowed” application continues from the date of the notice of allowance until it issues as a patent, unless it is withdrawn from issue (37 CFR 1.313), or becomes abandoned for failure to pay the issue fee and any required publication fee (37 CFR 1.314 and 1.316).

If the drawings in a patent application are not in compliance with the rules, the Office of Patent Application Processing (OPAP) will send a Notice to File Corrected Application Papers. This notice gives the applicant a time period of 2 months from the mailing date to file corrected drawings. The time period is extendable under 37 CFR 1.136(a). If corrected drawings are not timely filed, the application will be held abandoned.

If a drawing is not acceptable for publication, the Office of Patent Application Processing (OPAP) will object to the drawing and notify the applicant. The applicant will be given a time period of two months from the mail date of the Notice to file acceptable drawings. This period is extendable under 37 CFR 1.136(a) or (b) for patent applications filed under 35 U.S.C. 111, but not for design applications filed under 35 U.S.C. 171. Failure to comply with the Notice within the time period will result in abandonment of the application.

An abandoned patent application is one that has been removed from the USPTO’s docket of pending applications. According to MPEP 203.05, an application can become abandoned for several reasons:

An abandoned application is, inter alia, one which is removed from the Office docket of pending applications:

  • Formal abandonment by the applicant or their attorney/agent
  • Failure to take appropriate action during prosecution
  • Failure to pay the issue fee
  • For provisional applications, not filing a nonprovisional application within 12 months

Abandonment can have serious consequences, but in some cases, it may be possible to revive an abandoned application.

For more information on patent abandonment, visit: patent abandonment.

A nonprovisional patent application is designated as “rejected” if, during prosecution before allowance, it contains an examiner’s action that has not been replied to by the applicant. As stated in MPEP 203.02:

A nonprovisional application which, during its prosecution in the examining group and before allowance, contains an unanswered examiner’s action is designated as a “rejected” application. Its status as a “rejected” application continues as such until acted upon by the applicant in reply to the examiner’s action (within the allotted reply period), or until it becomes abandoned.

According to MPEP 203.05, there are four main reasons for patent application abandonment:

  1. Formal abandonment by the applicant or their representative
  2. Failure of the applicant to take appropriate action during prosecution
  3. Failure to pay the issue fee
  4. For provisional applications, the passage of 12 months from the filing date

The MPEP states: An abandoned application is, inter alia, one which is removed from the Office docket of pending applications: (A) through formal abandonment by the applicant or by the attorney or agent of record; (B) through failure of applicant to take appropriate action at some stage in the prosecution of a nonprovisional application; (C) for failure to pay the issue fee (MPEP ยง 711 to ยง 711.05); or (D) in the case of a provisional application, no later than 12 months after the filing date of the provisional application.

The consequences of not responding to a notice about an unlocatable file differ for pending applications and granted patents:

  • For pending applications: According to 37 CFR 1.251(b), failure to comply with one of paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(3) of this section within the time period set in the notice will result in abandonment of the application.
  • For granted patents: While the patent won’t expire, the MPEP states that the only certified copy of the patent file that the Office will be able to produce will be a copy of the patent and a copy of the application-as-filed (which may have an adverse impact during attempts to enforce the patent).

Additionally, for patents involved in USPTO proceedings, the Office may take action under 37 CFR 41.128 or 37 CFR 11.18.

To learn more:

What are the consequences of failing to submit an Information Disclosure Statement (IDS)?

Failing to submit an Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) can have serious consequences for patent applicants. According to MPEP 609:

“The failure to timely file an Information Disclosure Statement may result in the application being abandoned or may adversely affect the validity of the patent.”

Specifically:

  • The application may be abandoned if the IDS is not filed within the time periods specified in 37 CFR 1.97.
  • If a patent is granted, it may be invalidated if it’s later discovered that material information was intentionally withheld from the USPTO during prosecution.
  • The applicant may be accused of inequitable conduct, which can render the entire patent unenforceable.

It’s crucial for applicants to diligently submit all known material information to the USPTO through proper IDS filings to avoid these potential issues.

To learn more:

According to 37 CFR 5.1(d), an applicant must take one of three actions to prevent abandonment of a national security classified patent application without a Secrecy Order. The MPEP states: Pursuant to 37 CFR 5.1(d), if no Secrecy Order has issued in a national security classified patent application, the Office will set a time period within which the applicant must take one of the following three actions in order to prevent abandonment of the application: (A) obtain a Secrecy Order; (B) declassify the application; or (C) submit evidence of a good faith effort to obtain a Secrecy Order pursuant to 37 CFR 5.2(a). These actions ensure proper handling of potentially sensitive information.

For more information on patent abandonment, visit: patent abandonment.

If an examiner comes across a patent application that contains national security markings but does not have a Secrecy Order imposed, MPEP 130 instructs that “the examiner should require the applicant to seek imposition of a Secrecy Order or authority to cancel the markings.” This should be done preferably with the first office action and before final disposition of the application.

37 CFR 5.1(d) states that if no Secrecy Order has issued, the USPTO will set a time period for the applicant to take one of three actions to prevent abandonment:

  1. Obtain a Secrecy Order
  2. Declassify the application
  3. Submit evidence of a good faith effort to obtain a Secrecy Order under 37 CFR 5.2(a)

Additionally, per 37 CFR 5.1(e), “a national security classified patent application will not be allowed until the application is declassified and any Secrecy Order pursuant to 37 CFR 5.2(a) has been rescinded.”

Yes, failure to pay the issue fee can result in an abandoned patent application. MPEP 203.05 explicitly states that an abandoned application includes one removed from the Office docket for failure to pay the issue fee (MPEP ยง 711 to ยง 711.05). This means that even if an application has been approved for issuance, if the applicant fails to pay the required issue fee within the specified time frame, the application will be considered abandoned.

For more detailed information on this topic, you can refer to MPEP ยง 711 to ยง 711.05.

Patent Procedure (11)

A provisional patent application is considered abandoned no later than 12 months after its filing date. MPEP 203.05 states that an abandoned application includes, in the case of a provisional application, no later than 12 months after the filing date of the provisional application (see MPEP ยง 711.03(c) and 35 U.S.C. 111(b)(5)). This means that provisional applications have a statutory life of one year from their filing date, after which they are automatically abandoned if not converted to a nonprovisional application or claimed as priority in a nonprovisional application.

For more information, you can refer to MPEP ยง 711.03(c) and 35 U.S.C. 111(b)(5).

Once a nonprovisional patent application has been examined and determined to meet all statutory requirements, a notice of allowance is sent to the applicant. The status of the application is then considered “allowed” or “in issue”. As per MPEP 203.04:

An “allowed” nonprovisional application or an application “in issue” is one which has been examined and determined to meet all statutory requirements, and in which a notice of allowance has been sent to the applicant. Its status as an “allowed” application continues from the date of the notice of allowance until it issues as a patent, unless it is withdrawn from issue (37 CFR 1.313), or becomes abandoned for failure to pay the issue fee and any required publication fee (37 CFR 1.314 and 1.316).

If the drawings in a patent application are not in compliance with the rules, the Office of Patent Application Processing (OPAP) will send a Notice to File Corrected Application Papers. This notice gives the applicant a time period of 2 months from the mailing date to file corrected drawings. The time period is extendable under 37 CFR 1.136(a). If corrected drawings are not timely filed, the application will be held abandoned.

If a drawing is not acceptable for publication, the Office of Patent Application Processing (OPAP) will object to the drawing and notify the applicant. The applicant will be given a time period of two months from the mail date of the Notice to file acceptable drawings. This period is extendable under 37 CFR 1.136(a) or (b) for patent applications filed under 35 U.S.C. 111, but not for design applications filed under 35 U.S.C. 171. Failure to comply with the Notice within the time period will result in abandonment of the application.

An abandoned patent application is one that has been removed from the USPTO’s docket of pending applications. According to MPEP 203.05, an application can become abandoned for several reasons:

An abandoned application is, inter alia, one which is removed from the Office docket of pending applications:

  • Formal abandonment by the applicant or their attorney/agent
  • Failure to take appropriate action during prosecution
  • Failure to pay the issue fee
  • For provisional applications, not filing a nonprovisional application within 12 months

Abandonment can have serious consequences, but in some cases, it may be possible to revive an abandoned application.

For more information on patent abandonment, visit: patent abandonment.

A nonprovisional patent application is designated as “rejected” if, during prosecution before allowance, it contains an examiner’s action that has not been replied to by the applicant. As stated in MPEP 203.02:

A nonprovisional application which, during its prosecution in the examining group and before allowance, contains an unanswered examiner’s action is designated as a “rejected” application. Its status as a “rejected” application continues as such until acted upon by the applicant in reply to the examiner’s action (within the allotted reply period), or until it becomes abandoned.

According to MPEP 203.05, there are four main reasons for patent application abandonment:

  1. Formal abandonment by the applicant or their representative
  2. Failure of the applicant to take appropriate action during prosecution
  3. Failure to pay the issue fee
  4. For provisional applications, the passage of 12 months from the filing date

The MPEP states: An abandoned application is, inter alia, one which is removed from the Office docket of pending applications: (A) through formal abandonment by the applicant or by the attorney or agent of record; (B) through failure of applicant to take appropriate action at some stage in the prosecution of a nonprovisional application; (C) for failure to pay the issue fee (MPEP ยง 711 to ยง 711.05); or (D) in the case of a provisional application, no later than 12 months after the filing date of the provisional application.

The consequences of not responding to a notice about an unlocatable file differ for pending applications and granted patents:

  • For pending applications: According to 37 CFR 1.251(b), failure to comply with one of paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(3) of this section within the time period set in the notice will result in abandonment of the application.
  • For granted patents: While the patent won’t expire, the MPEP states that the only certified copy of the patent file that the Office will be able to produce will be a copy of the patent and a copy of the application-as-filed (which may have an adverse impact during attempts to enforce the patent).

Additionally, for patents involved in USPTO proceedings, the Office may take action under 37 CFR 41.128 or 37 CFR 11.18.

To learn more:

What are the consequences of failing to submit an Information Disclosure Statement (IDS)?

Failing to submit an Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) can have serious consequences for patent applicants. According to MPEP 609:

“The failure to timely file an Information Disclosure Statement may result in the application being abandoned or may adversely affect the validity of the patent.”

Specifically:

  • The application may be abandoned if the IDS is not filed within the time periods specified in 37 CFR 1.97.
  • If a patent is granted, it may be invalidated if it’s later discovered that material information was intentionally withheld from the USPTO during prosecution.
  • The applicant may be accused of inequitable conduct, which can render the entire patent unenforceable.

It’s crucial for applicants to diligently submit all known material information to the USPTO through proper IDS filings to avoid these potential issues.

To learn more:

According to 37 CFR 5.1(d), an applicant must take one of three actions to prevent abandonment of a national security classified patent application without a Secrecy Order. The MPEP states: Pursuant to 37 CFR 5.1(d), if no Secrecy Order has issued in a national security classified patent application, the Office will set a time period within which the applicant must take one of the following three actions in order to prevent abandonment of the application: (A) obtain a Secrecy Order; (B) declassify the application; or (C) submit evidence of a good faith effort to obtain a Secrecy Order pursuant to 37 CFR 5.2(a). These actions ensure proper handling of potentially sensitive information.

For more information on patent abandonment, visit: patent abandonment.

Yes, failure to pay the issue fee can result in an abandoned patent application. MPEP 203.05 explicitly states that an abandoned application includes one removed from the Office docket for failure to pay the issue fee (MPEP ยง 711 to ยง 711.05). This means that even if an application has been approved for issuance, if the applicant fails to pay the required issue fee within the specified time frame, the application will be considered abandoned.

For more detailed information on this topic, you can refer to MPEP ยง 711 to ยง 711.05.