Patent Law FAQ
This FAQ answers all your questions about patent law, patent procedure, and the patent examination process.
MPEP 200 – Types and Status of Application; Benefit and Priority (2)
When claiming benefit to multiple prior applications, applicants must carefully establish a chain of copendency. The MPEP 211.01(b) provides guidance:
“The reference to the prior applications must identify all of the prior applications and indicate the relationship (i.e., continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part) between each nonprovisional application in order to establish copendency throughout the entire chain of prior applications.”
Key points to remember:
- References must be made in each intermediate application in the chain.
- A specific reference is required for each prior-filed application and cannot be incorporated by reference from a prior application.
- There is no limit to the number of prior applications through which a chain of copendency may be traced.
It’s crucial to properly reference all prior applications to ensure the desired benefit claims are recognized. Failure to do so may result in the need for a petition under 37 CFR 1.78 and payment of a petition fee.
To learn more:
Can a continuation-in-part (CIP) application claim benefit to multiple prior applications?
Yes, a continuation-in-part (CIP) application can claim benefit to multiple prior applications, provided certain conditions are met. The MPEP states:
“An applicant may claim the benefit of the filing date of one or more prior applications under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) in a later-filed application … if the later-filed application is filed before the patenting or abandonment of or termination of proceedings on the prior application.”
However, it’s important to note that for a CIP application:
- New matter in the CIP will only get the benefit of the CIP’s filing date.
- Matter disclosed in the prior application(s) can claim the earlier filing date(s).
- Each claim in the CIP is evaluated separately to determine which filing date it is entitled to.
For more details, see MPEP 211.01 and MPEP 201.08.
To learn more:
- continuation-in-part
- CIP
- multiple prior applications
- 35 U.S.C. 120
- 35 U.S.C. 121
- 35 U.S.C. 365(c)
- 35 U.S.C. 386(c)
To learn more:
Patent Law (2)
When claiming benefit to multiple prior applications, applicants must carefully establish a chain of copendency. The MPEP 211.01(b) provides guidance:
“The reference to the prior applications must identify all of the prior applications and indicate the relationship (i.e., continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part) between each nonprovisional application in order to establish copendency throughout the entire chain of prior applications.”
Key points to remember:
- References must be made in each intermediate application in the chain.
- A specific reference is required for each prior-filed application and cannot be incorporated by reference from a prior application.
- There is no limit to the number of prior applications through which a chain of copendency may be traced.
It’s crucial to properly reference all prior applications to ensure the desired benefit claims are recognized. Failure to do so may result in the need for a petition under 37 CFR 1.78 and payment of a petition fee.
To learn more:
Can a continuation-in-part (CIP) application claim benefit to multiple prior applications?
Yes, a continuation-in-part (CIP) application can claim benefit to multiple prior applications, provided certain conditions are met. The MPEP states:
“An applicant may claim the benefit of the filing date of one or more prior applications under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) in a later-filed application … if the later-filed application is filed before the patenting or abandonment of or termination of proceedings on the prior application.”
However, it’s important to note that for a CIP application:
- New matter in the CIP will only get the benefit of the CIP’s filing date.
- Matter disclosed in the prior application(s) can claim the earlier filing date(s).
- Each claim in the CIP is evaluated separately to determine which filing date it is entitled to.
For more details, see MPEP 211.01 and MPEP 201.08.
To learn more:
- continuation-in-part
- CIP
- multiple prior applications
- 35 U.S.C. 120
- 35 U.S.C. 121
- 35 U.S.C. 365(c)
- 35 U.S.C. 386(c)
To learn more:
Patent Procedure (2)
When claiming benefit to multiple prior applications, applicants must carefully establish a chain of copendency. The MPEP 211.01(b) provides guidance:
“The reference to the prior applications must identify all of the prior applications and indicate the relationship (i.e., continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part) between each nonprovisional application in order to establish copendency throughout the entire chain of prior applications.”
Key points to remember:
- References must be made in each intermediate application in the chain.
- A specific reference is required for each prior-filed application and cannot be incorporated by reference from a prior application.
- There is no limit to the number of prior applications through which a chain of copendency may be traced.
It’s crucial to properly reference all prior applications to ensure the desired benefit claims are recognized. Failure to do so may result in the need for a petition under 37 CFR 1.78 and payment of a petition fee.
To learn more:
Can a continuation-in-part (CIP) application claim benefit to multiple prior applications?
Yes, a continuation-in-part (CIP) application can claim benefit to multiple prior applications, provided certain conditions are met. The MPEP states:
“An applicant may claim the benefit of the filing date of one or more prior applications under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) in a later-filed application … if the later-filed application is filed before the patenting or abandonment of or termination of proceedings on the prior application.”
However, it’s important to note that for a CIP application:
- New matter in the CIP will only get the benefit of the CIP’s filing date.
- Matter disclosed in the prior application(s) can claim the earlier filing date(s).
- Each claim in the CIP is evaluated separately to determine which filing date it is entitled to.
For more details, see MPEP 211.01 and MPEP 201.08.
To learn more:
- continuation-in-part
- CIP
- multiple prior applications
- 35 U.S.C. 120
- 35 U.S.C. 121
- 35 U.S.C. 365(c)
- 35 U.S.C. 386(c)
To learn more: