What is the “reasonable basis” standard for prior art operability in patent examinations?
This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.
The “reasonable basis” standard for prior art operability in patent examinations refers to the level of evidence required to establish a prima facie case of anticipation or obviousness. According to MPEP 2121:
“When the reference relied on expressly anticipates or makes obvious all of the elements of the claimed invention, the reference is presumed to be operable. Once such a reference is found, the burden is on applicant to rebut the presumption of operability.”
This means that an examiner only needs a reasonable basis to believe that the prior art is operable. The applicant then bears the burden of proving inoperability if they wish to challenge the reference.