What is the process for incorporating new legal interpretations into USPTO policy?
The process for incorporating new legal interpretations into USPTO policy involves several steps and key officials. According to MPEP 1721: “It may be necessary for the Director, General Counsel, Solicitor, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, Commissioner for Patents, one or more Deputy Commissioners for Patents and TC Director making the recommendation to meet to review and…
Read MoreHow does the PCT handle applications related to computer programs?
The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) has specific provisions for handling applications related to computer programs. According to MPEP 1843.02, which cites PCT Rule 39: “No International Searching Authority shall be required to search an international application if, and to the extent to which, its subject matter is any of the following: … (vi) computer programs…
Read MoreHow long can issuance of a patent be deferred?
According to the MPEP, the standard deferment period is typically limited: “It has been the policy of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to defer issuance of a patent, upon request, for a period of up to 1 month only, in the absence of extraordinary circumstances or requirement of the regulations (e.g., 37 CFR 1.177)…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle design patent applications with offensive subject matter?
The USPTO rejects design patent applications that disclose offensive subject matter. According to MPEP 1504.01(e): “Design applications which disclose subject matter which could be deemed offensive to any race, religion, sex, ethnic group, or nationality, such as those which include caricatures or depictions, should be rejected as nonstatutory subject matter under 35 U.S.C. 171.” Key…
Read MoreHow does the rejection of offensive design patents align with free speech principles?
The rejection of offensive design patents by the USPTO, as outlined in MPEP 1504.01(e), raises interesting questions about the balance between intellectual property protection and free speech principles. Key points to consider include: Government Speech Doctrine: The granting of patents could be considered a form of government speech, which allows for content-based restrictions. Limited Public…
Read MoreWhen did the USPTO introduce the non-electronic filing portion of the PCT transmittal fee?
The USPTO introduced the non-electronic filing portion of the PCT transmittal fee for international applications filed on or after November 15, 2011. This change was implemented to encourage electronic filing and improve efficiency in the application process. As stated in the MPEP: “For international applications filed on or after November 15, 2011, the transmittal fee…
Read MoreWhat subject matter is exempt from international search requirements?
According to MPEP 1843.02, certain subject matter is not required to be searched by International Searching Authorities. These include: Scientific and mathematical theories Plant or animal varieties or essentially biological processes for their production Schemes, rules, or methods of doing business, performing purely mental acts, or playing games Methods for treatment of the human or…
Read MoreHow often is the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) updated to reflect new court decisions?
The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) is updated periodically to incorporate new court decisions and changes in USPTO policy. While the MPEP 1721 does not specify an exact frequency, it states: “Ultimately, the policy implications of the decision will be officially incorporated into the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure and Office of Patent Training…
Read MoreWhat are considered “extraordinary circumstances” for deferring patent issuance?
The MPEP provides guidance on what is not considered extraordinary circumstances for deferring patent issuance: “Situations like negotiation of licenses, time for filing in foreign countries, collection of data for filing a continuation-in-part application, or a desire for simultaneous issuance of related applications are not considered to amount to extraordinary circumstances.” While the MPEP does…
Read MoreWhat role does the Deputy Commissioner for Patents play in addressing new court decisions?
The Deputy Commissioner for Patents plays a crucial role in addressing new court decisions that affect USPTO policy. According to MPEP 1721: “The Deputy Commissioner for Patents who oversees the Office of Petitions will then consult appropriate Office officials, as necessary, to formulate a recommendation to the Commissioner for Patents on the policy implications of…
Read More