What format is required for submitting sequence listings in provisional applications filed on or after July 1, 2022?

For provisional applications filed on or after July 1, 2022, if an applicant chooses to submit nucleotide and/or amino acid sequence data, it must be in a specific format. The MPEP states: if submitted in a provisional application filed on or after July 1, 2022, any submission of nucleotide and/or amino acid sequence data must…

Read More

Are provisional applications required to comply with sequence listing requirements?

According to MPEP 2422.07, provisional applications are not required to comply with sequence listing requirements: “Provisional applications filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(b) need not comply with 37 CFR 1.821 through 1.825, however, applicants are encouraged to file a “Sequence Listing” as defined in 37 CFR 1.821(c) for ease of identification of the sequence information contained…

Read More

Are provisional applications subject to the same sequence listing requirements as non-provisional applications?

Provisional applications have slightly different requirements for sequence listings compared to non-provisional applications, as outlined in MPEP 2422.07: Provisional applications filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(b) do not need to meet the sequence listing requirements to receive a filing date. However, complying with the sequence rules is necessary to complete the application and obtain a filing…

Read More

Can provisional applications be amended to correct a non-compliant Sequence Listing XML?

No, provisional applications cannot be amended to correct a non-compliant Sequence Listing XML. The MPEP clearly states: Provisional applications cannot be amended, so if a provisional application contains a non-compliant “Sequence Listing XML” no notice relating to the requirements will be mailed in a provisional application. This means that if you submit a non-compliant Sequence…

Read More

What are the four types of U.S. national applications?

According to the MPEP, there are four types of U.S. national applications: A national stage application under 35 U.S.C. 371 A regular domestic national application filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) A provisional application filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(b) An international design application filed under the Hague Agreement The MPEP states: “There are four types of…

Read More

Are provisional applications classified and assigned to examiners?

No, provisional applications are not classified or assigned to examiners. The MPEP 909.02(b) clearly states: “Provisional applications (Plant only) are not classified or assigned since they are not examined.” This means that: Provisional applications do not go through the same classification process as nonprovisional applications. They are not assigned to an examiner for examination. This…

Read More

How are patent applications classified and assigned to examiners?

According to MPEP 909.02(b), the classification and assignment process for patent applications is as follows: For nonprovisional design and plant applications: Every new or amended application, including drawings, is classified and assigned to an examiner when first assigned to a Technology Center (TC). The supervisory patent examiner typically assigns the application to an examiner. For…

Read More

How is the effective filing date determined for prior art purposes?

The effective filing date for prior art purposes is generally the earliest filing date to which the application is entitled. This can include provisional applications, foreign priority applications, and earlier-filed U.S. applications, provided they adequately support the claimed invention. The MPEP notes: In determining the pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e) date, consider benefit claims to earlier-filed…

Read More

Can design patent applications claim priority to provisional applications?

No, design patent applications cannot claim priority to provisional applications. This is explicitly stated in MPEP 1504.10: “Design applications may not claim the benefit of a provisional application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e).“ This restriction is also supported by 35 U.S.C. 172, which states that “The right of priority provided for by section 119(e) shall not…

Read More