What is the time limit for claiming benefit of a prior-filed application in an international design application?

The time limit for claiming benefit of a prior-filed application in an international design application is specified in MPEP 2920.05(e): “The right of priority may be restored where the international design application is filed after the expiration of the priority period but within a period of two months from the expiration of the priority period.”…

Read More

How does a proper priority claim affect the prior art status of international applications?

A proper priority claim can significantly affect the prior art status of international applications. The MPEP 2127 provides guidance on this: “If the international application does not have an earlier effective date under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) based on a proper priority claim to an earlier filed U.S. application, the international application is only effective as…

Read More

What are the requirements for a U.S. patent document to claim priority or benefit under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(d)?

For a U.S. patent document to be “entitled to claim” priority or benefit of a prior-filed application under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(d), it must meet three ministerial requirements: Contain a priority or benefit claim to the prior-filed application Be filed within the applicable filing period requirement Have a common inventor or be by the same…

Read More

How does priority claim affect the effective filing date in pre-AIA patent applications?

Priority claims can significantly impact the effective filing date of a claimed invention in pre-AIA patent applications. The MPEP 2139.01 states: “If the application properly claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to a provisional application, the effective filing date is the filing date of the provisional application for any claims which are fully supported under…

Read More

How can an applicant overcome a rejection under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e)?

An applicant can overcome a rejection under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e) through several methods: Persuasively arguing that the claims are patentably distinguishable from the prior art Amending the claims to patentably distinguish over the prior art Filing an affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.132 showing that the reference invention is not by “another” Filing…

Read More