How should I submit a request for supplemental examination?

A request for supplemental examination should be submitted as a new, separate, and independent submission. It should not be deposited in the file of the patent for which supplemental examination is requested, or in any other application, patent, or proceeding file. The request should be clearly identified with a heading such as “REQUEST FOR SUPPLEMENTAL…

Read More

How do I file papers in a supplemental examination proceeding?

To file papers in a supplemental examination proceeding, follow these guidelines: Use the USPTO’s Patent Electronic Filing System-Web (EFS-Web) or Patent Center for electronic filing. For paper filings, send documents to: Mail Stop Supplemental Examination, Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. Include the control number assigned to the supplemental examination proceeding. Clearly…

Read More

How do I file papers in an ex parte reexamination resulting from a supplemental examination?

When filing papers in an ex parte reexamination resulting from a supplemental examination, follow these guidelines as per MPEP 2806: Use the USPTO’s Patent Electronic Filing System-Web (EFS-Web) or Patent Center for electronic filing. For paper filings, send documents to: Mail Stop Ex Parte Reexam, Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. Include…

Read More

What is the difference between filing papers for supplemental examination and ex parte reexamination?

The main differences in filing papers for supplemental examination and ex parte reexamination are: Mailing Address: Supplemental examination papers go to “Mail Stop Supplemental Examination,” while ex parte reexamination papers go to “Mail Stop Ex Parte Reexam.” Marking: Papers should be marked “SUPPLEMENTAL EXAMINATION” or “EX PARTE REEXAMINATION” respectively. Control Number: Each proceeding is assigned…

Read More

How does the USPTO evaluate “reasonable diligence” in filing a reissue application?

The USPTO evaluates “reasonable diligence” in filing a reissue application on a case-by-case basis, considering the specific circumstances of each situation. According to MPEP 1403: “What constitutes reasonable diligence must be determined on a case-by-case basis, taking all the facts and circumstances into account.” Factors that the USPTO may consider include: The complexity of the…

Read More

What is the role of the Receiving Office (RO) in the PCT process?

The Receiving Office (RO) plays a crucial role in the initial stages of the PCT process. According to the MPEP, The receiving Office functions as the filing and formalities review organization for international applications. The main responsibilities of the Receiving Office include: Accepting and processing international applications Conducting formalities review Granting an international filing date…

Read More

What are the main differences between a national application filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) and a national stage application submitted under 35 U.S.C. 371?

The main differences between a national application filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) and a national stage application submitted under 35 U.S.C. 371 include: Filing Date Priority Requirements Unity of Invention Filing Fees As stated in MPEP 1896: “The differences between a national application filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) and a national application submitted under 35…

Read More