What is the role of the Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) in ex parte reexamination proceedings?

The Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) plays a crucial role in ex parte reexamination proceedings. According to MPEP 2254: “The Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) is responsible for the examination and related prosecution in all ex parte reexamination proceedings.“ This means that the CRU handles the examination process, including reviewing prior art, assessing patentability, and conducting the…

Read More

What is the role of the Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) in processing ex parte reexamination request corrections?

The Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) plays a crucial role in processing corrections to incomplete ex parte reexamination requests. According to the MPEP: “All processing of submissions to cure an incomplete request for ex parte reexamination filed under 35 U.S.C. 302 (see MPEP § 2227) is carried out by the Central Reexamination Unit (CRU).” This means…

Read More

How are canceled claims handled in the ex parte reexamination certificate?

Canceled claims are handled specifically in the ex parte reexamination certificate. The MPEP 2287 states: “Claims which were canceled will be replaced by a statement in the reexamination certificate that the claims were canceled.” This means that rather than simply omitting the canceled claims, the certificate explicitly acknowledges their cancellation. This approach ensures a clear…

Read More

Can a patent owner file an ex parte reexamination request?

Yes, a patent owner can file an ex parte reexamination request. The MPEP 2210 states: “If a request filed by the patent owner includes a proposed amendment in accordance with 37 CFR 1.530, excess claims fees under 37 CFR 1.20(c)(3) and (c)(4) may also apply.” This provision allows patent owners to proactively address potential patentability…

Read More

How are Board decisions treated in ex parte reexamination proceedings?

Board decisions in ex parte reexamination proceedings are treated similarly to those in regular patent applications. MPEP § 2277 specifies that: “MPEP § 1213 through § 1213.03 relate to decisions of the Board for both applications and ex parte reexamination proceedings.” This means that the procedures and guidelines outlined in these MPEP sections apply equally…

Read More

What is the basis for determining a “substantial new question of patentability” in ex parte reexamination?

The determination of a “substantial new question of patentability” under 35 U.S.C. 303(a) can be based on any prior art patents or printed publications. The MPEP states: “The determination under 35 U.S.C. 303(a) whether or not ‘a substantial new question of patentability’ is present can be based upon any prior art patents or printed publications.”…

Read More