How should an applicant handle potentially conflicting claims in copending applications?

How should an applicant handle potentially conflicting claims in copending applications? When dealing with potentially conflicting claims in copending applications, applicants must be proactive and transparent. MPEP 2001.06(b) provides guidance: “If the copending application is not commonly owned and the applicant is aware of the copending application, the applicant should disclose the existence of the…

Read More

How does fraud or inequitable conduct affect reissue applications?

Fraud, inequitable conduct, or violation of duty of disclosure in the original patent application can significantly impact reissue applications. The MPEP states: “Fraud” cannot be purged through the reissue process. This means that if fraud was committed in the original application, it cannot be remedied by filing a reissue application. Furthermore, the MPEP notes: Clearly,…

Read More

What is the impact of fraud, inequitable conduct, or violation of duty of disclosure on patent claims?

According to MPEP 2016, a finding of fraud, inequitable conduct, or violation of duty of disclosure affects all claims in a patent application or patent, rendering them unpatentable or invalid. The MPEP states: “A finding of ‘fraud,’ ‘inequitable conduct,’ or violation of duty of disclosure with respect to any claim in an application or patent,…

Read More

Can failure to disclose material information affect patent validity?

Yes, failure to disclose material information can significantly affect patent validity. If it is discovered that an applicant or their representative knowingly withheld material information during the patent application process, it could lead to charges of inequitable conduct and potentially render the patent unenforceable. While MPEP 2001.03 does not explicitly discuss the consequences of failing…

Read More

What is the extent of the duty of disclosure?

The duty of disclosure extends to all dealings with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), not just interactions with patent examiners. This comprehensive obligation includes proceedings before various departments within the USPTO. As stated in MPEP 2001.03: “This duty ‘in dealing with’ and ‘to’ the Office extends, of course, to all dealings which…

Read More

How does the duty of disclosure differ in supplemental examination?

The duty of disclosure in supplemental examination is similar to reexamination proceedings, but with some key differences. According to MPEP 2014: “In supplemental examination, the duty of disclosure applies to the patent owner and individuals associated with the patent owner as defined in 37 CFR 1.555. However, as provided by 37 CFR 1.625(d)(4), information material…

Read More

Who is subject to the duty of disclosure in international design applications?

According to MPEP 2920.05(f), the individuals subject to the duty of disclosure in international design applications designating the United States are defined in 37 CFR 1.56(c) as: Each inventor named in the application Each attorney or agent who prepares or prosecutes the application Every other person who is substantively involved in the preparation or prosecution…

Read More

What is the duty of disclosure in reexamination proceedings?

What is the duty of disclosure in reexamination proceedings? The duty of disclosure in reexamination proceedings is a crucial aspect of patent law. According to MPEP 2280, “The duty of disclosure requirements for individuals associated with the patent owner in a reexamination proceeding is the same as for individuals associated with the patent owner in…

Read More

Does the duty of disclosure apply to proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board?

Yes, the duty of disclosure applies to proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). The obligation to disclose material information extends beyond interactions with patent examiners and includes all dealings with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). MPEP 2001.03 explicitly states: “For example, the duty would extend to proceedings before the…

Read More