Does correcting inventorship through reissue enlarge the scope of patent claims?

No, correcting inventorship through reissue does not enlarge the scope of the patent claims. The MPEP explicitly states: “The correction of inventorship does not enlarge the scope of the patent claims.” This is important because it means that a reissue application for correcting inventorship can be filed even when the reissue application does not seek…

Read More

What is a “generic claim” in patent applications?

A generic claim in patent applications is a claim that encompasses a broad group of inventions or species. According to MPEP 806.04: “A generic claim should comprehend the subject matter of possible species claims, and is necessarily broader in scope than the species claims.” Generic claims are important because they provide broader protection for an…

Read More

How should examiners analyze variant embodiments within the scope of a claim?

Examiners should carefully analyze claims to recognize variant embodiments that may not be explicitly disclosed in the application but fall within the claim’s scope. The MPEP provides guidance on this process: “Frequently, a claim includes within its breadth or scope one or more variant embodiments that are not disclosed in the application, but which would…

Read More

When is a Patentability Report not appropriate in patent examination?

Patentability Reports are not always the most efficient or appropriate method for patent examination. MPEP 705.01(e) outlines situations where Patentability Reports are ordinarily not proper: “Where claims are directed to the same character of invention but differ in scope only, prosecution by Patentability Report is never proper.” Additionally, Patentability Reports are generally not appropriate in…

Read More