How are time extensions handled in PTAB proceedings?

Time extensions in Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) proceedings are handled by the Chief Administrative Patent Judge. According to MPEP 1002.02(f), the Chief Administrative Patent Judge is responsible for “Petitions for extension of time in Patent Trial and Appeal Board proceedings.” This means that if a party in a PTAB proceeding requires additional time,…

Read More

What are the Chief Administrative Patent Judge’s responsibilities regarding PTAB member designations?

The Chief Administrative Patent Judge has significant responsibilities in designating members of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) for various proceedings. According to MPEP 1002.02(f), these responsibilities include: Designating PTAB members to review adverse decisions of examiners on patent applications Designating members for ex parte reexaminations Designating members for derivation proceedings, inter partes reviews,…

Read More

What types of requests can the Chief Administrative Patent Judge handle related to PTAB functions?

The Chief Administrative Patent Judge is authorized to handle various requests related to superintending the functions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). According to MPEP 1002.02(f), these requests include: Requests for decisions on policy questions certified by PTAB panels or judges Petitions to review determinations of non-compliant briefs Certifications of decisions to disqualify…

Read More

What authority does the Chief Administrative Patent Judge have regarding time extensions in PTAB proceedings?

The Chief Administrative Patent Judge has authority to grant time extensions in various Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) proceedings. According to MPEP 1002.02(f), this authority includes: Granting extensions of pendency for up to six months in inter partes or post-grant review proceedings Handling petitions for time extensions for seeking rehearing in ex parte appeals…

Read More

How can the Chief Administrative Patent Judge address issues related to substantial new questions of patentability in ex parte reexaminations?

The Chief Administrative Patent Judge has the authority to address issues related to substantial new questions of patentability in ex parte reexaminations. According to MPEP 1002.02(f): “If raised properly during ex parte reexamination and in a subsequent appeal, issues relating to an examiner’s determination that a reference raises a substantial new question of patentability. See…

Read More

What is the role of the Chief Administrative Patent Judge in PTAB proceedings?

The Chief Administrative Patent Judge plays a crucial role in Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) proceedings. According to MPEP 1002.02(f), their responsibilities include: Designating panels to conduct hearings in the PTAB Deciding petitions for extensions of time in PTAB proceedings Making determinations of whether to allow amendments to the description of the invention in…

Read More

Can the Chief Administrative Patent Judge decide on petitions to review decisions of the Board?

No, the Chief Administrative Patent Judge does not have the authority to decide on petitions to review decisions of the Board. According to MPEP 1002.02(f), “Petitions to review decisions of the Board in patent cases are handled by the Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy.” This separation of duties ensures an independent review process for…

Read More

What authority does the Chief Administrative Patent Judge have regarding petitions and matters at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board?

The Chief Administrative Patent Judge has extensive authority over various petitions and matters at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). According to MPEP 1002.02(f), this authority includes: Re-delegating authority to other judges Ordering the dismissal of certain interferences Designating PTAB members for various proceedings Handling requests related to superintending PTAB functions The MPEP states:…

Read More

What authority does the Chief Administrative Patent Judge have over PTAB hearings?

The Chief Administrative Patent Judge has the authority to designate panels to conduct hearings in the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). According to MPEP 1002.02(f), the Chief Administrative Patent Judge is responsible for “Designation of panels to conduct hearings in the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.” This authority ensures that appropriate panels are formed…

Read More

What authority does the Chief Administrative Patent Judge have regarding interference proceedings?

The Chief Administrative Patent Judge has specific authority regarding interference proceedings, particularly concerning amendments to the description of the invention. According to MPEP 1002.02(f), the Chief Administrative Patent Judge is responsible for “Determinations of whether to allow amendments to the description of the invention in interference proceedings.” This authority is crucial in maintaining the integrity…

Read More