Patent Law FAQ

This FAQ answers all your questions about patent law, patent procedure, and the patent examination process.

Here’s the complete FAQ:

c Expand All C Collapse All

MPEP 150-Statements to DOE and NASA (2)

When the USPTO makes a formal request for a property rights statement in accordance with 42 U.S.C. 2182 (DOE) or 51 U.S.C. 20135 (NASA), the applicant has a 30-day statutory period to respond. There is no provision for an extension of this 30-day time period.

As stated in MPEP 150, “If no proper and timely statement is received, the application will be held abandoned and the applicant so notified. Such applications may be revived under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.137.”

If an applicant fails to respond to a request for a property rights statement, there can be serious consequences for the patent application. According to MPEP 150:

If no proper and timely statement is received, the application will be held abandoned and the applicant so notified.

The process typically involves:

  • An initial informal request (45-Day Letter)
  • If no response or if the statement is defective, a formal request is made with a 30-day statutory period for response
  • No extensions are available for this 30-day period
  • Failure to respond properly results in the application being held abandoned

However, abandoned applications may be revived under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.137, as noted in the case of In re Rutan, 231 USPQ 864 (Comm’r Pat. 1986).

For more information on patent applications, visit: patent applications.

For more information on revival, visit: revival.

MPEP 200 - Types and Status of Application; Benefit and Priority Claims (1)

When an abandoned application is later revived, it retains its original filing date. The revival process effectively removes the abandonment status, allowing the application to continue prosecution. However, the period of abandonment may impact patent term adjustment calculations. For more information on revival procedures, refer to MPEP 711 and 37 CFR 1.137.

MPEP 203 - Status of Applications (1)

When an abandoned application is later revived, it retains its original filing date. The revival process effectively removes the abandonment status, allowing the application to continue prosecution. However, the period of abandonment may impact patent term adjustment calculations. For more information on revival procedures, refer to MPEP 711 and 37 CFR 1.137.

Patent Law (5)

When the USPTO makes a formal request for a property rights statement in accordance with 42 U.S.C. 2182 (DOE) or 51 U.S.C. 20135 (NASA), the applicant has a 30-day statutory period to respond. There is no provision for an extension of this 30-day time period.

As stated in MPEP 150, “If no proper and timely statement is received, the application will be held abandoned and the applicant so notified. Such applications may be revived under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.137.”

When an abandoned application is later revived, it retains its original filing date. The revival process effectively removes the abandonment status, allowing the application to continue prosecution. However, the period of abandonment may impact patent term adjustment calculations. For more information on revival procedures, refer to MPEP 711 and 37 CFR 1.137.

If the filing fee for a provisional application is not paid, the USPTO will take specific actions as outlined in MPEP 601.01(b):

Quote: “If the filing fee is not paid in the provisional application, the USPTO may dispose of the provisional application. The notification to applicant that the provisional application has been disposed of will include a notice that if the fee is paid within two months of the date of the notification, the provisional application will be revived.”

Key points to remember:

  • The USPTO may dispose of the provisional application if the fee is not paid
  • Applicants will be notified of the disposal
  • There is a two-month window to pay the fee and revive the application
  • If the fee is paid within this period, the application will be revived

It’s crucial to note that if the application is not revived within the two-month period, the opportunity to establish that filing date may be permanently lost, which could have significant implications for patent rights.

To learn more:

If an applicant fails to submit required application components within the specified time period, the following consequences may occur:

  • The application may be considered abandoned.
  • If abandoned, the application will be treated as though it had never been filed.
  • The applicant may lose the benefit of the original filing date.

The MPEP states: Upon failure to submit the fee, oath or declaration, and 1 or more claims within such prescribed period, the application shall be regarded as abandoned.

However, it may be possible to revive an abandoned application under certain circumstances:

  • The applicant can file a petition to revive under 37 CFR 1.137.
  • The petition must be accompanied by the required reply, the petition fee, and a statement that the entire delay was unintentional.

It’s crucial to respond to any notices from the USPTO promptly and to submit all required components within the specified timeframes to avoid these issues.

To learn more:

If an applicant fails to respond to a request for a property rights statement, there can be serious consequences for the patent application. According to MPEP 150:

If no proper and timely statement is received, the application will be held abandoned and the applicant so notified.

The process typically involves:

  • An initial informal request (45-Day Letter)
  • If no response or if the statement is defective, a formal request is made with a 30-day statutory period for response
  • No extensions are available for this 30-day period
  • Failure to respond properly results in the application being held abandoned

However, abandoned applications may be revived under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.137, as noted in the case of In re Rutan, 231 USPQ 864 (Comm’r Pat. 1986).

For more information on patent applications, visit: patent applications.

For more information on revival, visit: revival.

Patent Procedure (4)

When an abandoned application is later revived, it retains its original filing date. The revival process effectively removes the abandonment status, allowing the application to continue prosecution. However, the period of abandonment may impact patent term adjustment calculations. For more information on revival procedures, refer to MPEP 711 and 37 CFR 1.137.

If the filing fee for a provisional application is not paid, the USPTO will take specific actions as outlined in MPEP 601.01(b):

Quote: “If the filing fee is not paid in the provisional application, the USPTO may dispose of the provisional application. The notification to applicant that the provisional application has been disposed of will include a notice that if the fee is paid within two months of the date of the notification, the provisional application will be revived.”

Key points to remember:

  • The USPTO may dispose of the provisional application if the fee is not paid
  • Applicants will be notified of the disposal
  • There is a two-month window to pay the fee and revive the application
  • If the fee is paid within this period, the application will be revived

It’s crucial to note that if the application is not revived within the two-month period, the opportunity to establish that filing date may be permanently lost, which could have significant implications for patent rights.

To learn more:

If an applicant fails to submit required application components within the specified time period, the following consequences may occur:

  • The application may be considered abandoned.
  • If abandoned, the application will be treated as though it had never been filed.
  • The applicant may lose the benefit of the original filing date.

The MPEP states: Upon failure to submit the fee, oath or declaration, and 1 or more claims within such prescribed period, the application shall be regarded as abandoned.

However, it may be possible to revive an abandoned application under certain circumstances:

  • The applicant can file a petition to revive under 37 CFR 1.137.
  • The petition must be accompanied by the required reply, the petition fee, and a statement that the entire delay was unintentional.

It’s crucial to respond to any notices from the USPTO promptly and to submit all required components within the specified timeframes to avoid these issues.

To learn more:

If an applicant fails to respond to a request for a property rights statement, there can be serious consequences for the patent application. According to MPEP 150:

If no proper and timely statement is received, the application will be held abandoned and the applicant so notified.

The process typically involves:

  • An initial informal request (45-Day Letter)
  • If no response or if the statement is defective, a formal request is made with a 30-day statutory period for response
  • No extensions are available for this 30-day period
  • Failure to respond properly results in the application being held abandoned

However, abandoned applications may be revived under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.137, as noted in the case of In re Rutan, 231 USPQ 864 (Comm’r Pat. 1986).

For more information on patent applications, visit: patent applications.

For more information on revival, visit: revival.