Question 1

What is a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) in the context of design applications?

Accepted Answer

A Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) is a type of patent application that allows applicants to continue prosecution of a prior design application. It's important to note that CPAs are now only available for design applications, not utility applications.

While the MPEP ¶ 2.32 doesn't provide a direct definition of a CPA, it implies its use in the context of design applications:

Receipt is acknowledged of the statement requesting that [1] be deleted as a named inventor which was filed with the Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) on [2].

CPAs allow applicants to:

Continue prosecution of a previously filed design application
Make amendments or corrections, such as deleting a named inventor
Potentially receive further examination without filing a new application

For more detailed information on CPAs, refer to MPEP § 201.06(d).

For more information on CPA, visit: CPA.

For more information on design applications, visit: design applications.

For more information on patent prosecution, visit: patent prosecution.

For more information on USPTO procedures, visit: USPTO procedures.

Question 2

How does abandonment of a patent application affect priority claims?

Accepted Answer

Abandonment of a patent application can significantly affect priority claims, particularly for continuing applications. The MPEP 711.02 notes:

"Where the application is abandoned after the close of prosecution as defined in MPEP § 711.03(c), the failure to take any necessary action prior to the expiration of the period for reply in the last Office action (or notice) will result in abandonment of the application."

If an application becomes abandoned, it may break the chain of priority for any subsequent continuing applications. This can result in the loss of earlier filing date benefits and potentially affect the patentability of related inventions.

To learn more:

abandonment
priority claims
continuing applications
patent prosecution

Question 3

How does the USPTO handle patent applications when an inventor dies during prosecution?

Accepted Answer

When an inventor dies during the prosecution of a patent application, the USPTO has specific procedures in place:

If the inventor died after filing the application, the legal representative (executor or administrator of the estate) can proceed with the application.
The legal representative must submit evidence of their authority, such as Letters Testamentary or Letters of Administration.
If there are joint inventors, the surviving inventors can continue the prosecution.
The oath or declaration requirement can be fulfilled by the legal representative or the joint inventors.

As stated in MPEP 409.01: "If an inventor dies during the prosecution of an application, the legal representative (executor, administrator, etc.) of the deceased inventor may make the necessary oath or declaration."

To learn more:

Question 4

How should applicants prepare for a patent examiner interview?

Accepted Answer

How should applicants prepare for a patent examiner interview?

Proper preparation is crucial for a successful patent examiner interview. The MPEP provides guidance on this topic:

"The attorney or agent should be fully prepared to discuss the issues raised in the Office action." (MPEP 713.01)

To prepare effectively:

Review the Office action: Thoroughly understand the rejections and objections raised by the examiner.
Prepare arguments: Develop clear, concise arguments addressing each point in the Office action.
Consider amendments: If proposing claim amendments, have them ready in proper form.
Gather evidence: Compile any relevant prior art, declarations, or other supporting documents.
Set clear goals: Determine what you hope to achieve in the interview (e.g., agreement on allowable subject matter, clarification of a rejection).
Prepare an agenda: Outline the topics you wish to discuss to keep the interview focused and productive.
Schedule appropriately: Allow enough time for a thorough discussion and follow proper USPTO procedures for scheduling.

By being well-prepared, applicants can make the most of the interview opportunity and potentially advance prosecution more efficiently.

To learn more:

Question 5

How does election by originally presented claims work in patent applications?

Accepted Answer

Election by originally presented claims is explained in MPEP 818.02(a). The key points are:

Claims added before the first restriction requirement or first Office action on the merits are considered originally presented claims.
These originally presented claims, along with those filed at application, determine the elected invention.
This election carries over to any request for continued examination (RCE).

The MPEP states: "The claims originally presented and acted upon by the Office on their merits determine the invention elected by an applicant in the application, and in any request for continued examination (RCE) filed for the application." This means that the initial set of claims establishes the elected invention, even without an explicit election statement from the applicant.

To learn more:

Question 6

How do I respond to an Election of Species requirement?

Accepted Answer

To respond to an Election of Species requirement, you should follow these steps:

Elect a single disclosed species or a single grouping of patentably indistinct species.
Identify the claims encompassing the elected species or grouping.
Optionally, include arguments traversing the requirement.

According to MPEP 809.02(a):

"Applicant is advised that the reply to this requirement to be complete must include (i) an election of a species to be examined even though the requirement may be traversed (37 CFR 1.143) and (ii) identification of the claims encompassing the elected species or grouping of patentably indistinct species, including any claims subsequently added."

Remember, if you want to preserve your right to petition, you must make the election with traverse and present your arguments at the time of election.

To learn more:

Question 7

Can appeal fees be refunded if a patent appeal is withdrawn or dismissed?

Accepted Answer

The refund of appeal fees in cases of withdrawal or dismissal depends on the specific circumstances and timing. Generally:

If an appeal is withdrawn prior to the filing of an appeal brief, a portion of the appeal fee may be refunded.
Once an appeal brief has been filed, typically no refund is available.
In cases of dismissal, refunds are usually not granted unless there's an error on the part of the USPTO.

For precise information on fee refunds, refer to MPEP 1215 and consult with a patent attorney. The USPTO's fee schedule and refund policies should also be reviewed for the most current information.

To learn more:

Patent Law FAQ

This FAQ answers all your questions about patent law, patent procedure, and the patent examination process.

MPEP 200 – Types and Status of Application; Benefit and Priority (1)

What is a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) in the context of design applications?

MPEP 201 – Types of Applications (1)

What is a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) in the context of design applications?

MPEP 400 – Representative of Applicant or Owner (1)

How does the USPTO handle patent applications when an inventor dies during prosecution?

Patent Law (2)

What is a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) in the context of design applications?

How does the USPTO handle patent applications when an inventor dies during prosecution?

Patent Procedure (2)

What is a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) in the context of design applications?

How does the USPTO handle patent applications when an inventor dies during prosecution?