Patent Law FAQ
This FAQ answers all your questions about patent law, patent procedure, and the patent examination process.
Here’s the complete FAQ:
MPEP 500 - Receipt and Handling of Mail and Papers (3)
When the USPTO cannot locate a patent or application file after a reasonable search, they follow the procedure outlined in 37 CFR 1.251. The key steps are:
- The Office notifies the applicant or patentee about the unlocatable file.
- A time period is set for the applicant or patentee to comply with the notice.
- The applicant or patentee must respond by either:
- Providing a copy of their record of all correspondence with the Office (except U.S. patent documents)
- Producing their record for the Office to copy
- Stating that they do not possess any record of the correspondence
As stated in MPEP 508.04, “37 CFR 1.251 sets forth a procedure for the reconstruction of the file of a patent application, patent, or any other patent-related proceeding that cannot be located after a reasonable search.”
When a patent or application file cannot be located after a reasonable search, the USPTO has a specific procedure outlined in 37 CFR 1.251. The Office will notify the applicant or patentee and set a time period for compliance with one of the following options:
- Provide a copy of all correspondence records between the Office and the applicant/patentee, along with a list and a statement of completeness.
- Produce the applicant’s/patentee’s records for the Office to copy, along with a statement of completeness.
- If no records are possessed, provide a statement to that effect.
The MPEP states, 37 CFR 1.251 sets forth a procedure for the reconstruction of the file of a patent application, patent, or any other patent-related proceeding that cannot be located after a reasonable search.
For pending applications, failure to comply within the set time period will result in abandonment of the application.
For more information on file reconstruction, visit: file reconstruction.
For more information on USPTO procedures, visit: USPTO procedures.
The time limits for responding to a notice under 37 CFR 1.251 vary depending on whether it’s for an application or a patent:
- For applications: The Office sets a three-month period for reply, which is extendable under 37 CFR 1.136(a) by up to three additional months, for a maximum of six months.
- For patents: The Office sets a six-month period for reply, which is not extendable.
MPEP 508.04 states: “The Office will set a time period of three months for reply in a notice under 37 CFR 1.251 in an application. The time period will be extendable under 37 CFR 1.136(a) (unless the notice indicates otherwise) by three months up to a maximum period for reply of six months in an application.” It also notes: “The Office will set a time period of six months for reply in a notice under 37 CFR 1.251 in a patent. The time period will not be extendable under 37 CFR 1.136(a) in a patent.”
MPEP 508 - Distribution (3)
When the USPTO cannot locate a patent or application file after a reasonable search, they follow the procedure outlined in 37 CFR 1.251. The key steps are:
- The Office notifies the applicant or patentee about the unlocatable file.
- A time period is set for the applicant or patentee to comply with the notice.
- The applicant or patentee must respond by either:
- Providing a copy of their record of all correspondence with the Office (except U.S. patent documents)
- Producing their record for the Office to copy
- Stating that they do not possess any record of the correspondence
As stated in MPEP 508.04, “37 CFR 1.251 sets forth a procedure for the reconstruction of the file of a patent application, patent, or any other patent-related proceeding that cannot be located after a reasonable search.”
When a patent or application file cannot be located after a reasonable search, the USPTO has a specific procedure outlined in 37 CFR 1.251. The Office will notify the applicant or patentee and set a time period for compliance with one of the following options:
- Provide a copy of all correspondence records between the Office and the applicant/patentee, along with a list and a statement of completeness.
- Produce the applicant’s/patentee’s records for the Office to copy, along with a statement of completeness.
- If no records are possessed, provide a statement to that effect.
The MPEP states, 37 CFR 1.251 sets forth a procedure for the reconstruction of the file of a patent application, patent, or any other patent-related proceeding that cannot be located after a reasonable search.
For pending applications, failure to comply within the set time period will result in abandonment of the application.
For more information on file reconstruction, visit: file reconstruction.
For more information on USPTO procedures, visit: USPTO procedures.
The time limits for responding to a notice under 37 CFR 1.251 vary depending on whether it’s for an application or a patent:
- For applications: The Office sets a three-month period for reply, which is extendable under 37 CFR 1.136(a) by up to three additional months, for a maximum of six months.
- For patents: The Office sets a six-month period for reply, which is not extendable.
MPEP 508.04 states: “The Office will set a time period of three months for reply in a notice under 37 CFR 1.251 in an application. The time period will be extendable under 37 CFR 1.136(a) (unless the notice indicates otherwise) by three months up to a maximum period for reply of six months in an application.” It also notes: “The Office will set a time period of six months for reply in a notice under 37 CFR 1.251 in a patent. The time period will not be extendable under 37 CFR 1.136(a) in a patent.”
Patent Law (3)
When the USPTO cannot locate a patent or application file after a reasonable search, they follow the procedure outlined in 37 CFR 1.251. The key steps are:
- The Office notifies the applicant or patentee about the unlocatable file.
- A time period is set for the applicant or patentee to comply with the notice.
- The applicant or patentee must respond by either:
- Providing a copy of their record of all correspondence with the Office (except U.S. patent documents)
- Producing their record for the Office to copy
- Stating that they do not possess any record of the correspondence
As stated in MPEP 508.04, “37 CFR 1.251 sets forth a procedure for the reconstruction of the file of a patent application, patent, or any other patent-related proceeding that cannot be located after a reasonable search.”
When a patent or application file cannot be located after a reasonable search, the USPTO has a specific procedure outlined in 37 CFR 1.251. The Office will notify the applicant or patentee and set a time period for compliance with one of the following options:
- Provide a copy of all correspondence records between the Office and the applicant/patentee, along with a list and a statement of completeness.
- Produce the applicant’s/patentee’s records for the Office to copy, along with a statement of completeness.
- If no records are possessed, provide a statement to that effect.
The MPEP states, 37 CFR 1.251 sets forth a procedure for the reconstruction of the file of a patent application, patent, or any other patent-related proceeding that cannot be located after a reasonable search.
For pending applications, failure to comply within the set time period will result in abandonment of the application.
For more information on file reconstruction, visit: file reconstruction.
For more information on USPTO procedures, visit: USPTO procedures.
The time limits for responding to a notice under 37 CFR 1.251 vary depending on whether it’s for an application or a patent:
- For applications: The Office sets a three-month period for reply, which is extendable under 37 CFR 1.136(a) by up to three additional months, for a maximum of six months.
- For patents: The Office sets a six-month period for reply, which is not extendable.
MPEP 508.04 states: “The Office will set a time period of three months for reply in a notice under 37 CFR 1.251 in an application. The time period will be extendable under 37 CFR 1.136(a) (unless the notice indicates otherwise) by three months up to a maximum period for reply of six months in an application.” It also notes: “The Office will set a time period of six months for reply in a notice under 37 CFR 1.251 in a patent. The time period will not be extendable under 37 CFR 1.136(a) in a patent.”
Patent Procedure (3)
When the USPTO cannot locate a patent or application file after a reasonable search, they follow the procedure outlined in 37 CFR 1.251. The key steps are:
- The Office notifies the applicant or patentee about the unlocatable file.
- A time period is set for the applicant or patentee to comply with the notice.
- The applicant or patentee must respond by either:
- Providing a copy of their record of all correspondence with the Office (except U.S. patent documents)
- Producing their record for the Office to copy
- Stating that they do not possess any record of the correspondence
As stated in MPEP 508.04, “37 CFR 1.251 sets forth a procedure for the reconstruction of the file of a patent application, patent, or any other patent-related proceeding that cannot be located after a reasonable search.”
When a patent or application file cannot be located after a reasonable search, the USPTO has a specific procedure outlined in 37 CFR 1.251. The Office will notify the applicant or patentee and set a time period for compliance with one of the following options:
- Provide a copy of all correspondence records between the Office and the applicant/patentee, along with a list and a statement of completeness.
- Produce the applicant’s/patentee’s records for the Office to copy, along with a statement of completeness.
- If no records are possessed, provide a statement to that effect.
The MPEP states, 37 CFR 1.251 sets forth a procedure for the reconstruction of the file of a patent application, patent, or any other patent-related proceeding that cannot be located after a reasonable search.
For pending applications, failure to comply within the set time period will result in abandonment of the application.
For more information on file reconstruction, visit: file reconstruction.
For more information on USPTO procedures, visit: USPTO procedures.
The time limits for responding to a notice under 37 CFR 1.251 vary depending on whether it’s for an application or a patent:
- For applications: The Office sets a three-month period for reply, which is extendable under 37 CFR 1.136(a) by up to three additional months, for a maximum of six months.
- For patents: The Office sets a six-month period for reply, which is not extendable.
MPEP 508.04 states: “The Office will set a time period of three months for reply in a notice under 37 CFR 1.251 in an application. The time period will be extendable under 37 CFR 1.136(a) (unless the notice indicates otherwise) by three months up to a maximum period for reply of six months in an application.” It also notes: “The Office will set a time period of six months for reply in a notice under 37 CFR 1.251 in a patent. The time period will not be extendable under 37 CFR 1.136(a) in a patent.”