Question 1

What procedures does the USPTO use to ensure completeness of the patent file wrapper?

Accepted Answer

The USPTO has established specific procedures to ensure the completeness of the patent file wrapper while protecting sensitive information. MPEP 724.01 mentions that The procedures set forth in the following sections are designed to enable the Office to ensure as complete a patent file wrapper as possible while preventing unnecessary public disclosure of trade secrets, proprietary material, and protective order material. These procedures likely include guidelines for submitting and handling confidential information, as well as protocols for redacting or sealing certain documents when necessary.

To learn more:

Question 2

What is the process for handling confidential materials in reexamination proceedings?

Accepted Answer

In reexamination proceedings open to the public under 37 CFR 1.11(d), confidential materials submitted under MPEP § 724.02 are handled as follows:

Materials are sealed from public view and kept separate from the main reexamination file
A petition to expunge should accompany the submission or be filed shortly after
The examiner determines the materiality of the information to patentability
If found not material, the petition to expunge is granted
If found material, the petition is denied, and the information becomes public

The MPEP states: 'Any materials, i.e., information, properly submitted under MPEP § 724.02 in a reexamination proceeding will be sealed from public view. The submitted information will be maintained separate from the reexamination file and will not be publicly available until a determination has been made as to whether or not the information is material to patentability.'

It's crucial to note: 'If the petition to expunge is not filed in time to be addressed before the reexamination proceeding enters the reexamination certificate printing process, or the petition is filed, and denied/dismissed, then the materials submitted under MPEP § 724.02 will be released to the public with any other papers in the reexamination file.'

This process aims to protect confidential information while maintaining the public nature of reexamination proceedings.

To learn more:

Question 3

What is the process for expunging information from a patent application file?

Accepted Answer

The process for expunging information from a patent application file is outlined in 37 CFR 1.59. An applicant can request expungement by:

Filing a petition under 37 CFR 1.59(b)
Paying the required fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(g)
Establishing to the satisfaction of the Director that the expungement is appropriate

The MPEP states: Expungement of information that was originally submitted to the Office under MPEP § 724.02, or that should have been submitted in a sealed envelope as discussed in MPEP § 724.02, is appropriate when the petitioner complies with items (A)-(E) set forth in MPEP § 724.05, paragraph I, and the examiner or other appropriate Office official who is responsible for considering the information has determined that the information is not material to patentability.

To learn more:

Question 4

What information can be provided in response to status inquiries?

Accepted Answer

What information can be provided in response to status inquiries?

The USPTO has strict guidelines on the information that can be provided in response to status inquiries. MPEP 203.08 states:

"In no event will the following information be given over the telephone: (A) Filing date of applications; (B) Whether an application has been allowed, abandoned, or issued; (C) The date of allowance, abandonment or issue; and (D) Whether an assignment has been recorded."

This policy is designed to protect the privacy and confidentiality of patent applications. Applicants or their representatives must use official channels, such as Private PAIR or written requests, to obtain such specific information.

To learn more:

Question 5

What are the requirements for sending confidential information via email to the USPTO?

Accepted Answer

When sending confidential information via email to the USPTO, specific requirements must be met:

Use of the Electronic Filing System (EFS-Web) is strongly recommended for submitting confidential information.
If email must be used, it should be through the USPTO's secure email system.
An authorization from the applicant is required before sending confidential information via email.
The email must include a statement that the email correspondence is being submitted using the procedures set forth in 37 CFR 1.33(d).

As stated in MPEP 502.03: "Internet email shall NOT be used to conduct an exchange of communications similar to those exchanged during telephone or personal interviews unless a written authorization has been given."

To learn more:

email communication
confidential information
USPTO
patent application

Question 6

How does the USPTO handle confidential patent assignment information?

Accepted Answer

How does the USPTO handle confidential patent assignment information?

The USPTO generally treats patent assignment records as public information. However, there are provisions for handling confidential information within these records. MPEP 301.01 states:

"Assignments and other documents affecting title to applications, patents, and registrations that are recorded in the USPTO are generally open to public inspection. Only documents that are sealed as provided in 37 CFR 1.14 or otherwise not open to public inspection are not available for public inspection."

If a document contains sensitive information that should not be publicly disclosed, the parties involved can:

Redact confidential information before submitting the document for recordation
Request that certain documents be sealed under 37 CFR 1.14
Submit separate public and non-public versions of documents when necessary

It's important to note that the decision to seal documents is at the discretion of the USPTO and is generally limited to specific circumstances outlined in the regulations.

Question 7

How does the USPTO handle confidential information in patent applications?

Accepted Answer

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has strict rules for handling confidential information in patent applications, especially for those filed before June 8, 1995. According to MPEP 704.11(a):

"Regarding the identification of applications filed before June 8, 1995, 35 U.S.C. 122(a) requires the identified applications to be kept in confidence by the Office and no information concerning the same is to be given without authority of the applicant or owner unless necessary to carry out the provisions of an Act of Congress or in such special circumstances as may be determined by the Director."

This means that the USPTO is required by law to keep such applications confidential unless specific circumstances allow for disclosure. For more information on the handling of confidential information, you can refer to MPEP § 103.

To learn more:

MPEP 704.11(a)

Question 8

How does the USPTO handle confidential information in patent applications?

Accepted Answer

How does the USPTO handle confidential information in patent applications?

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has specific procedures for handling confidential information in patent applications. According to MPEP 724.01, the USPTO recognizes the need to protect certain types of sensitive information while maintaining the completeness of the patent file wrapper. Here's how confidential information is typically handled:

Protective Orders: In interference or trial proceedings, protective orders may be used to keep certain information confidential.
Sealed Records: In some cases, portions of the file may be sealed to protect confidential information.
Redaction: Sensitive information may be redacted from documents before they are made public.
Petition for Expungement: As mentioned in the previous FAQ, a petition under 37 CFR 1.59 can be filed to request the removal of confidential information.

The MPEP states:

"Papers and materials in an application file (including reissue applications) or a reexamination file should not be marked 'Confidential,' 'Secret,' or otherwise labeled with confidentiality designations, unless filed under a protective order or as part of a secrecy order application."

This guideline ensures that the USPTO can properly manage and disclose information as required by law while still protecting legitimately confidential material. Applicants should be cautious about what information they include in their applications and use appropriate channels to protect sensitive information when necessary.

To learn more:

MPEP 704.11(a)

Question 9

How does access to confidential information affect copying claims in patent disputes?

Accepted Answer

Access to confidential information can significantly strengthen copying claims in patent disputes. MPEP 716.06 cites the case of Liqwd, Inc. v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. to illustrate this point:

"Evidence that shows access to a competitor's non-public information and use of that information to develop a product may be persuasive evidence of copying. Liqwd, Inc. v. L'Oreal USA, Inc., 941 F.3d 1133, 1139 (Fed. Cir. 2019) (Liqwd presented evidence, such as emails and declarations, that showed L'Oreal had access to the then-confidential disclosure of the patent application and L'Oreal's subsequent loss of interest in purchasing Liqwd's technology)."

This case demonstrates that when a party has access to confidential information, such as a patent application, and subsequently develops a similar product, it can provide strong evidence of copying in patent disputes.

To learn more:

Question 10

How are proprietary materials handled under MPEP § 724.02?

Accepted Answer

How are proprietary materials handled under MPEP § 724.02?

Proprietary materials submitted under MPEP § 724.02 are handled with special care to protect sensitive information. The MPEP states:

'Proprietary information, which is information not trade secret information but which the submitter considers to be sensitive, may be submitted in a patent application or reexamination proceeding subject to the provisions of this section.'

This means that proprietary materials are treated similarly to trade secrets. They may include:

Technical data
Research results
Business strategies
Confidential agreements

When submitting proprietary materials, applicants should follow the procedures outlined in MPEP § 724.02 to ensure proper handling and protection of the information during the patent examination process.

To learn more:

MPEP 724.02

Question 11

How are materials submitted under MPEP § 724.02 handled in patent applications?

Accepted Answer

Materials submitted under MPEP § 724.02 are handled differently depending on whether they are submitted in an original application subject to 35 U.S.C. 122 or in a reissue application or reexamination file open to the public.

For original applications:

Materials are maintained in a sealed envelope marked 'Not Open To The Public'
They are not publicly available until a determination of their materiality to patentability is made
If found not material, they can be expunged upon petition
If found material or if no petition to expunge is filed, they become part of the public record

As stated in the MPEP: 'Prior to publication, an original application is not open to the public under 35 U.S.C. 122(a). After publication of the application under 35 U.S.C. 122(b)(1), where the application file and contents are available to the public pursuant to 37 CFR 1.11 or 1.14, any materials submitted under MPEP § 724.02 will only be released to the public with any other application papers if no petition to expunge (37 CFR 1.59) was filed prior to the mailing of a notice of allowability or notice of abandonment, or if a petition to expunge was filed and the petition was denied.'

To learn more:

Question 12

How are confidential materials handled in reissue applications open to the public?

Accepted Answer

Confidential materials submitted under MPEP § 724.02 in reissue applications open to the public under 37 CFR 1.11(b) are handled as follows:

Materials are kept separate from the main application file
They are not publicly available until a determination of materiality to patentability is made
If found not material, they can be expunged upon petition
If found material, the petition to expunge is denied, and the materials become part of the public record

The MPEP states: 'If any portion or all of the submitted information is found to be material to patentability, the petition to expunge will be denied and the information will thereafter become a permanent part of the reissue application file and open to the public.'

However, there is a provision for redaction: 'Where a submission containing protected material is found to be material to patentability, it still may be possible to redact the submission to eliminate the protected material while retaining the important material.'

This process balances the need for public disclosure in reissue applications with the protection of genuinely confidential information.

To learn more:

Question 13

Can protective order materials be submitted under MPEP § 724.02?

Accepted Answer

Can protective order materials be submitted under MPEP § 724.02?

Yes, protective order materials can be submitted under MPEP § 724.02. The MPEP specifically addresses this type of material:

'Protective order material is defined as trade secret or other confidential information protected by a court entered protective order.'

This provision allows for the submission of materials that are subject to a court-ordered protection. Such materials may include:

Confidential business information
Sensitive technical data
Information protected in ongoing litigation

When submitting protective order materials, applicants must ensure they comply with both the court order and the USPTO's procedures under MPEP § 724.02. This helps maintain the confidentiality of the information while allowing it to be considered in the patent examination process.

To learn more:

protective order materials
patent application
confidential information
MPEP 724.02

To learn more:

MPEP 724.02

Patent Law FAQ

Here’s the complete FAQ:

MPEP 200 - Types and Status of Application; Benefit and Priority (1)

What information can be provided in response to status inquiries?

What information can be provided in response to status inquiries?

MPEP 300 - Ownership and Assignment (1)

How does the USPTO handle confidential patent assignment information?

How does the USPTO handle confidential patent assignment information?

MPEP 301-Ownership/Assignability of Patents and Applications (1)

How does the USPTO handle confidential patent assignment information?

How does the USPTO handle confidential patent assignment information?

MPEP 500 - Receipt and Handling of Mail and Papers (1)

What are the requirements for sending confidential information via email to the USPTO?

Patent Law (3)

What information can be provided in response to status inquiries?

What information can be provided in response to status inquiries?

What are the requirements for sending confidential information via email to the USPTO?

How does the USPTO handle confidential patent assignment information?

How does the USPTO handle confidential patent assignment information?

Patent Procedure (3)

What information can be provided in response to status inquiries?

What information can be provided in response to status inquiries?

What are the requirements for sending confidential information via email to the USPTO?

How does the USPTO handle confidential patent assignment information?

How does the USPTO handle confidential patent assignment information?