MPEP § 1005 — Exceptions to Partial Signatory Authority (Annotated Rules)

§1005 Exceptions to Partial Signatory Authority

USPTO MPEP version: BlueIron's Update: 2025-12-31

This page consolidates and annotates all enforceable requirements under MPEP § 1005, including statutory authority, regulatory rules, examiner guidance, and practice notes. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only, it is not legal advice.

Exceptions to Partial Signatory Authority

This section addresses Exceptions to Partial Signatory Authority. Primary authority: 37 CFR 1.312, 37 CFR 1.130(a), and 37 CFR 1.130(b). Contains: 9 statements.

Key Rules

Topic

Signatory Authority Review

20 rules
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-1005-c476a14f29d98e2074aa03c5]
Amendments to Partial Signatory Authority
Note:
Modifies the requirements for partial signatory authority in patent applications.

10. 37 CFR 1.312 amendments (MPEP § 714.16).

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.312Signatory Authority ReviewAllowance Quality Review
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-1005-12100bf34246bbf620556d13]
Rejection of Previously Allowed Claim
Note:
This rule requires that a previously allowed claim be rejected if it does not meet the current requirements for allowance.

11. Rejection of previously allowed claim (MPEP § 706.04).

Jump to MPEP SourceSignatory Authority ReviewAllowance Quality Review
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-1005-f705a6aec4afbef0bff106b6]
Abandonment for Insufficient Reply
Note:
This rule states that failure to provide a proper reply within the required time frame results in abandonment of the application.

12. Final holding of abandonment for insufficient reply (MPEP § 711.03(a)).

Jump to MPEP SourceSignatory Authority ReviewAllowance Quality Review
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-1005-e402903605e4e2c60ae232c7]
Requirement for Affidavit or Declaration Evidence
Note:
This rule requires the submission of affidavit or declaration evidence under specific conditions outlined in various regulations.

13. Actions based on affidavit or declaration evidence (for example, under 37 CFR 1.130(a) (MPEP § 717.01(a) et seq.), 37 CFR 1.130(b) (MPEP § 717.01(b) et seq.), 37 CFR 1.131(a) (MPEP § 715.08), 37 CFR 1.131(c) (MPEP § 718), or 37 CFR 1.132 (MPEP § 716)).

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.130(a)Signatory Authority ReviewAllowance Quality Review
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-1005-5f85baf62c50959151f51ca4]
Suspension of Examiner Actions During Review
Note:
This rule outlines the conditions under which an examiner's actions may be suspended during a signatory authority review.

14. Suspension of examiner’s action (MPEP § 709).

Jump to MPEP SourceSignatory Authority ReviewAllowance Quality Review
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-1005-a0c4b37a95aa152df66310ef]
Oath or Declaration Required for Reissue Applications
Note:
The rule requires that an oath or declaration be provided for reissue applications, as detailed in MPEP § 1444.

15. Reissue applications (e.g., decisions on reissue oath or declaration, MPEP § 1444).

Jump to MPEP SourceSignatory Authority ReviewAllowance Quality ReviewReissue Oath or Declaration
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-1005-bcd80bfce35126bfe0a187a0]
Request for Extension of Time for Filing
Note:
This rule outlines the requirements for requesting an extension of time to file under 37 CFR 1.136(b) and MPEP § 710.02(e).

16. Requests for an extension of time under 37 CFR 1.136(b), (MPEP § 710.02(e)).

Jump to MPEP Source · 37 CFR 1.136(b)Signatory Authority ReviewAllowance Quality Review
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-1005-119beeb0f86ccc1d5e036274]
Requirement for Reexamination Proceedings
Note:
MPEP § 2236 outlines the requirements for initiating reexamination proceedings.

17. Reexamination proceedings (MPEP § 2236).

Jump to MPEP SourceSignatory Authority ReviewAllowance Quality Review
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-1005-eb19600a664fda5a0f78bff1]
Requirement for International Preliminary Examination Reports
Note:
MPEP § 1879 requires the submission of international preliminary examination reports as part of the allowance quality review process.

18. International Preliminary Examination Reports (MPEP § 1879).

Jump to MPEP SourceSignatory Authority ReviewAllowance Quality Review
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-1005-3470c466ef2081fb76a69d2d]
Actions Suggesting Interference Claims Required
Note:
The rule requires that certain actions be taken to suggest claims for interference purposes, as outlined in MPEP sections 2304.04 and 2304.04(b).

19. Actions suggesting claims for interference purposes (MPEP §§ 2304.04, 2304.04(b)).

Jump to MPEP SourceSignatory Authority ReviewAllowance Quality Review
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-1005-5ed64465b0d9f0b9a7d3d9b5]
Suggestion for Interference Required
Note:
The rule requires that a suggestion for interference be made when appropriate during the allowance quality review process.

20. Suggesting an interference (MPEP § 2302).

Jump to MPEP SourceSignatory Authority ReviewAllowance Quality Review
StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-1005-ddf4927929099c2ea92aad33]
Requirement for Proper Claim Support
Note:
The rule requires that claims must be supported by the written description, prohibiting the use of copied patent claims without proper support.

21. Actions involving copied patent claims (MPEP § 2304.04(b).

Jump to MPEP SourceSignatory Authority ReviewAllowance Quality Review
MPEP GuidanceInformativeAlways
[mpep-1005-0774beee1da84e743f05331c]
Allowance Quality Review Requirement
Note:
The rule requires that allowances be reviewed for quality to ensure compliance with signatory authority.

1. Allowances (MPEP § 1302.13).

Jump to MPEP SourceSignatory Authority ReviewAllowance Quality Review
MPEP GuidanceInformativeAlways
[mpep-1005-1975f267de8ac76dc8399b9b]
Examiner's Amendments Required
Note:
The rule requires that examiner amendments must be made in accordance with the MPEP § 1302.04.

2. Examiner's amendments (MPEP § 1302.04).

Jump to MPEP SourceSignatory Authority ReviewAllowance Quality Review
MPEP GuidanceInformativeAlways
[mpep-1005-19d6ca14d868afbbc86f2840]
Quayle Actions Required for Signatory Authority Review
Note:
These actions are necessary for reviewing signatory authority in the allowance quality review process.

3. Quayle actions (MPEP § 714.14).

Jump to MPEP SourceSignatory Authority ReviewAllowance Quality Review
MPEP GuidanceInformativeAlways
[mpep-1005-4d3671afcfbfe3228bcca6bd]
Final Rejection Requirements
Note:
MPEP sections detail the requirements for issuing final rejections in patent applications.

4. Final rejections (MPEP §§ 706.07 and 803.01).

Jump to MPEP SourceSignatory Authority ReviewAllowance Quality Review
MPEP GuidanceInformativeAlways
[mpep-1005-4878c0efd505f5e0734f8ebd]
Withdrawal of Final Rejection Is Permitted
Note:
This rule permits the withdrawal of a final rejection, aligning with MPEP sections 706.07(d) and 706.07(e).

5. Withdrawal of final rejection (MPEP §§ 706.07(d) and 706.07(e)).

Jump to MPEP SourceSignatory Authority ReviewAllowance Quality Review
MPEP GuidanceInformativeAlways
[mpep-1005-c172fafc628c599c9784708e]
Amendments After Final Rejection Must Be Addressed
Note:
The rule requires that any amendments submitted after a final rejection must be properly addressed by the examiner.

6. Actions on amendments submitted after final rejection (MPEP § 714.12).

Jump to MPEP SourceSignatory Authority ReviewAllowance Quality Review
MPEP GuidanceInformativeAlways
[mpep-1005-9225aab34dfb4afeb397c849]
Examiner Responses on Appeal Required
Note:
The rule requires that the examiner provide responses to appeals, ensuring quality review of allowance.

7. Examiner’s answers on appeal (MPEP § 1207).

Jump to MPEP SourceSignatory Authority ReviewAllowance Quality ReviewEx Parte Appeals to PTAB
MPEP GuidanceInformativeAlways
[mpep-1005-80d79465a6334b2328b05f23]
Request for Withdrawing from Issue Required
Note:
A request to withdraw an application from issue must be made according to the procedures outlined in MPEP § 1308.

9. Requests for withdrawal from issue (MPEP § 1308).

Jump to MPEP SourceSignatory Authority ReviewAllowance Quality Review
Topic

Reopening Prosecution After Allowance

1 rules
MPEP GuidanceInformativeAlways
[mpep-1005-0d3fb1c224a555b363d6e205]
Requirement for Reopening Prosecution After Allowance
Note:
This rule outlines the actions necessary to reopen prosecution after an application has been allowed, ensuring compliance with procedural requirements.

8. Actions reopening prosecution (MPEP § 1214.07).

Jump to MPEP SourceReopening Prosecution After AllowanceSignatory Authority ReviewAllowance Quality Review

Citations

Primary topicCitation
Signatory Authority Review37 CFR § 1.130(a)
Signatory Authority Review37 CFR § 1.130(b)
Signatory Authority Review37 CFR § 1.131(a)
Signatory Authority Review37 CFR § 1.131(c)
Signatory Authority Review37 CFR § 1.132
Signatory Authority Review37 CFR § 1.136(b)
Signatory Authority Review37 CFR § 1.312
Signatory Authority ReviewMPEP § 1207
Reopening Prosecution After AllowanceMPEP § 1214.07
Signatory Authority ReviewMPEP § 1302.04
Signatory Authority ReviewMPEP § 1302.13
Signatory Authority ReviewMPEP § 1308
Signatory Authority ReviewMPEP § 1444
Signatory Authority ReviewMPEP § 1879
Signatory Authority ReviewMPEP § 2236
Signatory Authority ReviewMPEP § 2302
Signatory Authority ReviewMPEP § 2304.04
Signatory Authority ReviewMPEP § 2304.04(b)
Signatory Authority ReviewMPEP § 706.04
Signatory Authority ReviewMPEP § 706.07
Signatory Authority ReviewMPEP § 706.07(d)
Signatory Authority ReviewMPEP § 709
Signatory Authority ReviewMPEP § 710.02(e)
Signatory Authority ReviewMPEP § 711.03(a)
Signatory Authority ReviewMPEP § 714.12
Signatory Authority ReviewMPEP § 714.14
Signatory Authority ReviewMPEP § 714.16
Signatory Authority ReviewMPEP § 715.08
Signatory Authority ReviewMPEP § 716
Signatory Authority ReviewMPEP § 717.01(a)
Signatory Authority ReviewMPEP § 717.01(b)
Signatory Authority ReviewMPEP § 718

Source Text from USPTO’s MPEP

This is an exact copy of the MPEP from the USPTO. It is here for your reference to see the section in context.

BlueIron Last Updated: 2025-12-31