Who declares and administers an interference proceeding?

The declaration and administration of an interference proceeding involve multiple parties within the USPTO. According to MPEP 2301: “Once an interference has been suggested under 37 CFR 41.202, the examiner refers the suggested interference to the Board. An administrative patent judge declares the interference, which is then administered at the Board.” Specifically: The examiner initially…

Read More

Who decides whether to institute a derivation proceeding?

The decision to institute a derivation proceeding is made by the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). As stated in MPEP 2310.01, which cites 35 U.S.C. 135(a)(1): “Whenever the Director determines that a petition filed under this subsection demonstrates that the standards for instituting a derivation proceeding are met, the Director…

Read More

Who conducts reexamination reviews at the USPTO?

Reexamination reviews at the USPTO are conducted by several entities: Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) Supervisory Patent Reexamination Specialist (SPRS) Technology Center (TC) Quality Assurance Specialist (QAS) Paralegals Other assigned technical support staff As stated in MPEP § 2289: “All reexamination cases are monitored and reviewed in the Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) or Technology Center (TC)…

Read More

Who conducts the reexamination review?

The reexamination review is conducted by specialized personnel within the USPTO. According to MPEP 2689: “After a reexamination case is acted on by the examiner and all premailing clerical processing is completed, the case is forwarded to the Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) Supervisory Patent Reexamination Specialist (SPRS) or Technology Center (TC) Quality Assurance Specialist (QAS).“…

Read More

Who typically conducts an inter partes reexamination?

Typically, the same patent examiner who decided to grant the reexamination request conducts the examination. As stated in MPEP § 2655: “The examination is ordinarily conducted by the same patent examiner who made the decision that the reexamination request should be granted.” This ensures continuity and familiarity with the case throughout the reexamination process. To…

Read More

Who typically conducts ex parte reexaminations?

Typically, the same patent examiner who made the decision on whether the reexamination request should be granted conducts the examination. As stated in MPEP § 2255: “The examination will ordinarily be conducted by the same patent examiner who made the decision on whether the reexamination request should be granted.” This ensures continuity in the examination…

Read More