What types of information are considered material in reexamination proceedings?

What types of information are considered material in reexamination proceedings? In reexamination proceedings, certain types of information are considered material to patentability. According to MPEP 2280, material information includes: Prior art patents or printed publications that are material to patentability under 37 CFR 1.56(b) Information on enablement, written description, and utility that is material to…

Read More

What are the main requirements under 35 U.S.C. 112(a)?

The main requirements under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) are: Written Description: The specification must contain a written description of the invention. Enablement: The specification must enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention. Best Mode: The specification must set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor for carrying out the…

Read More

What issues can arise from improperly presented prophetic examples?

Improperly presented prophetic examples in patent applications can lead to serious issues, including questions about the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure, and potential inequitable conduct charges. The MPEP 2164.02 warns: “When prophetic examples are described in a manner that is ambiguous or that implies that the results are actual, the adequacy and accuracy of…

Read More

What is the difference between inherent and explicit disclosure in patents?

The main difference between inherent and explicit disclosure in patents lies in how the information is presented in the patent application. MPEP 2163.07(a) explains: “By disclosing in a patent application a device that inherently performs a function or has a property, operates according to a theory or has an advantage, a patent application necessarily discloses…

Read More

How does the doctrine of inherent disclosure affect written description requirements?

The doctrine of inherent disclosure can significantly impact the written description requirements for patent applications. As stated in MPEP 2163.07(a): “Under the doctrine of inherent disclosure, when a specification describes an invention that has certain undisclosed yet inherent properties, that specification serves as adequate written description to support a subsequent patent application that explicitly recites…

Read More

Can the written description requirement be satisfied by inherent disclosure?

Yes, the written description requirement can potentially be satisfied by inherent disclosure, but this approach has limitations and requires careful consideration. The MPEP 2163.01 provides guidance on this matter: “To establish inherency, the extrinsic evidence ‘must make clear that the missing descriptive matter is necessarily present in the thing described in the reference, and that…

Read More