What is the significance of working examples in computer programming patent applications?

Working examples play a crucial role in computer programming patent applications, particularly in demonstrating enablement. MPEP 2164.06(c) emphasizes their importance: “The presence of a working example in the specification provides strong evidence that the disclosure is enabling.” Working examples serve several purposes: They demonstrate that the invention is operable and can be implemented They provide…

Read More

What role do working examples play in determining the quantity of experimentation?

Working examples play a crucial role in determining the quantity of experimentation required for enablement in patent applications. According to MPEP 2164.06: The presence of a working example in the specification provides strong evidence that the disclosure is enabling and reduces the quantity of experimentation required. Working examples serve several purposes: They demonstrate the invention’s…

Read More

How should experimental data and examples be presented in a patent application?

When presenting experimental data and examples in a patent application: Ensure accuracy of all statements and evidence Clearly distinguish between actual results and predicted results Use proper tense: past tense for actual experiments, present or future tense for prophetic examples Label examples as prophetic or working examples to avoid ambiguities MPEP 2004 advises: “Care should…

Read More

Can both working and prophetic examples be used in the same patent application?

Yes, a patent application can include both working examples and prophetic examples. However, it’s crucial to clearly distinguish between the two types. The MPEP 2164.02 states: “An example may be “working” or “prophetic.” A working example is based on work actually performed. A prophetic example describes an embodiment of the invention based on predicted results…

Read More