Are there different rules for amendments signed by juristic entities?
Yes, there are different rules for amendments signed by juristic entities (e.g., corporations, organizations) compared to individual applicants. The MPEP clearly states: An amendment submitted on behalf of a juristic entity must be signed by a patent practitioner. This means that unlike individual applicants, juristic entities cannot submit amendments signed by themselves or their employees…
Read MoreHow does the ‘No Inter Partes Questions Discussed Ex Parte’ rule affect patent applicants?
The ‘No Inter Partes Questions Discussed Ex Parte’ rule, as outlined in MPEP 713.06, affects patent applicants by: Ensuring fair treatment: All parties receive the same information and opportunities during the examination process. Limiting private communications: Applicants cannot discuss matters involving other parties with the examiner in private. Promoting transparency: All relevant discussions and decisions…
Read MoreWhat are the consequences of violating the ‘No Inter Partes Questions Discussed Ex Parte’ rule?
Violating the ‘No Inter Partes Questions Discussed Ex Parte’ rule, as stated in MPEP 713.06, can have serious consequences for both examiners and applicants: For examiners: Potential disciplinary action, including warnings, suspension, or termination. For applicants: Risk of invalidation of patents or adverse decisions in the examination process. For both: Damage to professional reputation and…
Read MoreHow are time periods computed for patent application actions?
How are time periods computed for patent application actions? Time periods for patent application actions are computed according to specific rules set by the USPTO. As stated in MPEP 710.02, “The day after the date of the Office action is the first day of the statutory period.” This means that the clock starts ticking on…
Read MoreCan original disclosure information be expunged from a patent application?
No, original disclosure information cannot be expunged from a patent application. According to 37 CFR 1.59(a)(2): Information forming part of the original disclosure (i.e., written specification including the claims, drawings, and any preliminary amendment present on the filing date of the application) will not be expunged from the application file. This rule ensures that the…
Read MoreWhy are examiners prohibited from discussing inter partes questions ex parte?
Examiners are prohibited from discussing inter partes questions ex parte to maintain fairness and prevent bias in the patent examination process. This rule, as stated in MPEP 713.06, ensures that all interested parties have equal access to information and prevents any party from gaining an unfair advantage through private discussions with the examiner. The prohibition…
Read MoreWhat are the reasons for accepting an express abandonment after the issue fee has been paid?
The USPTO may accept an express abandonment after the issue fee has been paid under specific circumstances. According to MPEP 711.05, these reasons are outlined in 37 CFR 1.313(c), which includes: A mistake on the part of the Office A violation of the duty of disclosure under 37 CFR 1.56 An unpatentability of one or…
Read More