What procedures should be followed when withdrawing a patent from issue under MPEP 1308.02?

MPEP 1308.02 does not provide detailed procedures for withdrawing a patent application from issue due to interference or derivation reasons. Instead, it directs readers to another section of the MPEP for this information: “For the procedure to be followed, see MPEP Chapter 2300.” This means that the specific steps and requirements for withdrawing a patent…

Read More

What is the recommended order of elements in a plant patent application?

The recommended order of elements in a plant patent application is specified in 37 CFR 1.163(b). According to this regulation: “The elements of the plant application, if applicable, should appear in the following order: Plant application transmittal form. Fee transmittal form. Application data sheet (see § 1.76). Specification. Drawings (in duplicate). The inventor’s oath or…

Read More

Where can I find the official requirements for appeal briefs in patent applications?

The official requirements for appeal briefs in patent applications, including reissue applications, can be found in two main sources: Code of Federal Regulations: 37 CFR 41.37 provides the regulatory requirements for appeal briefs. Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP): MPEP § 1205 offers detailed guidance on appeal brief requirements. As stated in MPEP 1454: “The…

Read More

What types of errors are not considered material mistakes in patent application publications?

The USPTO does not consider certain errors as material mistakes in patent application publications. These include: Errors in correspondence address Missing or incorrect assignment information Minor typographical errors Missing section headings Failure to include an amendment The MPEP specifically states: “Errors in the correspondence address, the assignment information or missing assignment information, minor typographical errors…

Read More

What is the significance of MPEP Chapter 2200 in relation to design patent reexaminations?

MPEP Chapter 2200 holds significant importance for design patent reexaminations. According to MPEP 1510: “See MPEP Chapter 2200 for practice and procedure for reexamination applications.” This directive underscores that Chapter 2200 is the primary source for comprehensive information on reexamination procedures, including those applicable to design patents. It contains detailed guidelines, requirements, and processes that…

Read More

Why is MPEP § 903.07 referenced in the section about classification changes for cases in issue?

MPEP § 903.07 is referenced in MPEP § 1307 because it provides detailed guidance on handling classification changes during the examination process, which remains relevant even after a case has been allowed. The reference states: “See MPEP § 903.07.” This cross-reference indicates that the procedures for managing classification changes in allowed cases are consistent with…

Read More

Can a local attorney conduct an interview on behalf of an out-of-town attorney?

While it’s not explicitly prohibited, the MPEP discourages interviews conducted by local attorneys on behalf of out-of-town attorneys if the purpose is solely to “sound out” the examiner. MPEP 713.03 states: “Interviews that are solely for the purpose of ‘sounding out’ the examiner, as by a local attorney acting for an out-of-town attorney, should not…

Read More

What are the differences in Internet searching for published vs. unpublished patent applications?

The USPTO guidelines for Internet searching differ significantly between published and unpublished patent applications. Key differences include: Published Applications: Examiners have more flexibility in their search queries. The MPEP states, “Any search query may include terminology related to the general state of the relevant technology, disclosed features from applicant’s disclosure and claim terminology.” Unpublished Applications:…

Read More